Mixed feelings about impact of Obama’s health plan on the disabled
As someone with a disability, I should be excited about President Obama’s health plan and motivated to fight for it to become law. But I’m not.
The proposal contains important elements that could improve the lives of many disabled Americans. But the thrust of the overall proposal seems so wrongheaded that passing it as is may do more harm than good in the long run.
The president included potentially significant initiatives designed to make it easier for disabled Americans who need daily assistance to remain in their homes and communities and avoid institutionalization. The Community First Choice option in the president’s plan would offer state governments more money from Medicaid to fund in-home support programs for Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities who need long-term care.
Funds would also be given to states to extend an ambitious program called the Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration. Its purpose is to help Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities who need long-term care “transition from an institutional to a community setting,” according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
There’s also a provision called the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act (CLASS Act). It creates a much-needed alternative long-term funding source besides Medicaid. After paying into a pool for a certain number of years through voluntary payroll deductions, working people who become disabled could receive a monthly benefit to help pay for whatever new assistance or equipment they might need.
It would be great if these ideas could become law through legislation not tied to the president’s larger health care financing agenda. The centerpiece of that plan is forcing Americans to purchase health insurance through the predatory private market with no public option as an alternative. In addition, Obama’s plan envisions cutting tens of billions of dollars from Medicare home health services.
So despite the benefits for persons with disabilities, I can’t bring myself to embrace the president’s full proposal. The collateral damage will be too great.
Mike Ervin is a writer and disability activist living in Chicago. He can be reached at pmproj [at] progressive [dot] org.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
CURRENT ISSUE: JUNE 2012
Cecile Richards
Ruth Conniff | "Millions of women are counting on us for care. And if we're gone, there's no one else there," says the head of Planned Parenthood.
What's at Stake in Wisconsin
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild | Much more than Scott Walker's future hangs in the balance.
The Mother of Midwifery
Eleanor J. Bader | Ina May Gaskin has delivered more than 1,200 babies and revolutionized the field.
Scott Walker, the Monster.
See more at http://www.zinasaunders.com -- On June 5th, the voters of Wisconsin will decide whether to recall Scott Walker, the monster created by an unholy alliance between the radical right and big business, who has made attacking unions the hallmark of his administration. Cover for The Progressive magazine June 2012: http://www.progressive.org
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
June 4, Madison, WI
Terry Tempest Williams on "The Power of Voice"
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild on
"What's at Stake in the Recall."
5:30-7:30 pm at the Lakeside St. Coffee House, 402 W. Lakeside St, Madison.
It's a fundraiser for The Progressive. Contributions are tax-deductible.
If you can't make it but would like to contribute anyway, please send your check to The Progressive, 409 E. Main St., Madison, WI 53703.










Comments
Hey, how about someone reading the Legislation, and
tell us what's in it, in total, and then write about it.
Are we still required, under penalty of Law, to buy Insurance from Corporations?
If so -- neat -- I'll buy some more Insurance Company Stock.
So I guess I am asking you for Stock Tips.