Barack Obama and the Fading of Hope

By Matthew Rothschild, February 1, 2010

Whither has it fled the visionary gleam?
Where is it now the glory and the dream?
—William Wordsworth

Face it: A lot of people fooled themselves. When Barack Obama was running for President, and when he won, people filled his empty but gift-wrapped box labeled “Hope” with huge dreams of a better America.

We wanted him to be a mix of Martin Luther King and FDR, but the odds always were that he would be a mix of Bill Clinton and George Bush the First, and so it has turned out, with a little George Bush the Second thrown in for bad measure and Jimmy Carter for good.

Some of the disappointment stems from self-deception, a willful stuffing of the ears during the campaign. Repeatedly, he told us he was going to take troops from Iraq and send them to Afghanistan.

That was one promise he kept.

No, he wasn’t just saying that to get elected. He wasn’t talking right so he could move left. He actually was on the right, at least as far as Afghanistan goes.

But it goes further, much further.

Take his State of the Union Address.

Did we need Barack Obama to say “the true engine of job creation will always be America’s businesses”?

Did we need Barack Obama to give corporations, big and small, more tax breaks, when even John McCain’s top economist recognizes that such tax breaks are among the least effective ways to get the economy moving again?

Did we need Barack Obama to come out for an across-the-board spending freeze, exempting the Pentagon, of course?

Did we need Barack Obama to dwell on the “burdens facing the middle class” while barely mentioning the burdens of those in poverty?

Did we need Barack Obama to issue an Executive Order to establish a commission that will pave the way for slashing Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security?

Did we need Barack Obama to come out for nuclear power? (He has since established, by Executive Order, a blue ribbon commission to study how to move forward with this, too.)

Did we need Barack Obama to advocate offshore oil drilling—and clean coal, as if there were such a thing?

Did we need Barack Obama to threaten Iran?

He talked about improving the nation’s image abroad, but he’s been disastrously ineffectual in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which lies at the heart of our sullied reputation.

In Latin America, he showed his true colors by failing to throw his weight behind restoring President Zelaya in Honduras and by signing a military base agreement with Colombia.

And for all his talk about ending torture, the United States is still disappearing people into black sites in Afghanistan—and still torturing them there. (See Anand Gopal’s horrifying report)

On civil liberties, his record is extremely mixed, and that’s being generous. The ACLU just put out a report, “America Unrestored,” that goes item by item.

Suffice it to say that he’s done nothing to prohibit the warrantless spying that was the hallmark of the Bush Administration. He’s done nothing to end the Secret Service’s use of “free speech zones.” And he continues to assert the right to hold people, indefinitely, without charge.

On the economy, he baked half a loaf of stimulus, even when he was warned by Nobel Prize winners Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman and the brilliant economist Dean Baker that a full loaf was needed to prevent 10 percent unemployment. And Obama surrounded himself with Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, and Ben Bernanke, the architects of disaster and bailouts. (Not for a moment do I believe that Obama “hated” the bank bailout. “We all hated it,” he said. Meaning Democrats and Republicans, alike. Square that with Sen. Durbin’s comment, “The banks own this place.”)

And on health care, he took the best proposal—single payer—off the table at the start and never, ever even put the second best proposal on the table, which would have been Medicare for All Who Want It. The bill he favors is a giveaway to the insurance industry.

Sure, he’s done some good things:

He lifted the global gag rule that prohibited NGOs receiving U.S. funds from even discussing abortion.

He signed the U.N. declaration on gay rights.

He’s trying to lift “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

He lifted the ban on immigrants with HIV.

He gave protection to transgender federal employees and hired Amanda Simpson in the Commerce Department, the first openly transgender Presidential appointee.

He promoted stem cell research.

He supported preventive health.

He deemphasized the war on drugs and instructed federal prosecutors not to go after medical marijuana users and providers.

Instead, Justice Department lawyers are once again going after civil rights violators, including Phoenix Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Obama recognized global warming, he let states impose stiffer carbon standards, and the EPA designated carbon dioxide as a health hazard.

He supported net neutrality.

He publicly defended workers’ rights to organize.

He’s made the government more open and transparent and responsive to FOIA requests.

He canceled the F-22.

He canceled missiles in Poland and the radar system in the Czech Republic.

He gave a great speech in Cairo.

He’s getting U.S. troops out of Iraq.

He’s pushing to reduce nuclear weapons.

And he appointed Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.

All this is not nothing.

But it doesn’t amount—it doesn’t come close to amounting—to the kind of change people hoped to get from Obama, and the kind of change this country desperately needs.

Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine. To subscribe for just $14.97 a year, just click here.

Comments

Johnny ----

Look, I find your responses to this AGW thing increasingly desperate.

And this debate with you is taking on the flavor of my arguing with some "Cult Member" that "Fred", his "Cult Founder", is in fact not "Creator of the Universe", which is to say, probably pointless, unless you kidnap them to undergo intense de-programing at an undisclosed location, and definitely not worth the trouble.

But, in an attempt at public service --- here goes ---

Today's CO2 levels are 385 ppm, on average.

Mammals began showing up in some form in the late
Triassic with it's CO2 levels of 1750 ppm

Followed by the Jurassic with CO2 levels of 1950 ppm

Then by the Cretaceous with CO2 levels of 1700 ppm

24 million years ago, during the Paleogene, CO2 Levels of 500 ppm, which is still higher than today's 385 ppm.

Yet the Paleogene contained periods of extreme global warming, greater than that of the previous periods that had higher CO2 levels, and yet again, even with CO2 levels greater than today, the Planet moved into an Ice Age.

But notice how the arrival of our ancestors, during this period, corresponded to the Earth moving into lower CO2 levels?

Could this be "Gaia" at work, trying to get her Atmospheric CO2 levels up, as she notices that there is too much Entrapped Carbon?

In this question, I am posing it in the context of the currently popular "Gaia Worship" behind a lot of Environmentalism, and I am using their own system as a basis for argument.

Perhaps Gaia has a vested interest in her current
"Alpha Monkeys", and in their continuing success at
releasing Entrapped Carbon?

That, and several more Volcanoes erupting, might just hit the Ole "G" Spot for "Her", carbon wise?

But, who knows?

Here we are in the Quaternary Period - Late Holocene Epoch, which is officially classified as an "Interglacial Period", meaning "in between glaciation", and perhaps during any approaching continuation of the current "Ice Age", it would be nice to have CO2 levels up around 2,000 ppm, in hope that those levels might be enough to dampen one of these events, as I find the prospect of having a 1 mile thick glacier lying on top of us, much more inconvenient than that of having the Earth heat up.

And by all means, let them Glaciers and Ice Caps recede, should we ever be so lucky.

The normal history of Planet Earth is one without all that Ice, and Glaciers can be quite a plague when, as in recent history, they suddenly start advancing.

Even during extremely high levels of CO2, such as the Earth during the Jurassic, with it's 1950 ppm, the Planet remained quite cool in places, as it does today.

It can be argued that Mammals are much more adaptive to Environmental shifts than Dinosaurs, and that comes in handy during periods of CO2 depletion, such as we have been experiencing for several million years.

Mammals will also adapt to any trend towards warming, which I doubt is in the cards, and would forecast "Global Cooling" as the Future.

If they still think we are dumb enough, they will try and place the blame for "Global Cooling" on CO2 also, but to any thinking individual, the "Geological Record" will not support that Thesis.

Preparatory moves were made for that explanation, when they suddenly changed the name from "Global Warming" to "Global Climate Change", a short while back.

As to CO2's toxicity?

Even your much beloved Gov Bureaucracy, "OSHA", says it is okay to breathe CO2 levels up to 5000 ppm, for an 8 hour period, and sets a limit of 30,000 ppm for short term exposure.

Current Atmospheric CO2 concentrations are .038%

At 1% concentrations, and that is 10,000 ppm, it begins to get toxic, with drowsiness setting in.

Unconsciousness usually does not begin until exposure of 1 to 2 hours at concentrations of 7% are reached.

Pay attention dude, you've been scammed by the Banksters!!!

And they apparently read the Children's Tale of "Chicken Little", and felt that was an adequate description of us, in their esteem.

It has been all about "Command and Control", further "Global Domination", and "Getting Richer", as they try and inflate another "Financial Bubble".

This is so obvious, that I am rapidly losing patience with anyone not seeing this, and you might see me revert to "Name Calling" in the future, and just tell you, "You are an Idiot", whenever this is brought up.

But for now, I have made an attempt to educate you,
and will probably be punished accordingly.

Why, in this day and age, should it come as a surprise to you, that you have been lied to?

Most of what you were taught is a "Lie".

Time to take the "Red Pill", my friend, as I was persuaded to do.

Time to pick out a new Religion.

--------------------------However Impatiently Yours,

--------------------------Rev. JimBo

Submitted by Rev. JimBo on Mon, 02/08/2010 - 12:24pm.

CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012

February 2012

Progressive Matt

The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House