Fire Rahm Emanuel Today!

Barack Obama should fire Rahm Emanuel today.
He has not served the President well as chief of staff.
One year ago, Obama took the oath of office riding a wave of goodwill. In the next six weeks, his popularity continued to soar. But now it’s hit bottom, and so have the Democratic prospects, after the debacle in Massachusetts.
Rahm Emanuel is responsible for a lot of this free fall.
Emanuel is a DLC Democrat, and he’s advised Obama to go in a DLC direction time and time again—and to disregard the progressive base.
On health care, Emanuel kept insisting that the public option was not very important. He helped engineer the under-the-table deal with the drug companies. He let Max Baucus dillydally, rather than push hard for a vote before last summer. And then he and Obama bent over backwards to placate Senators Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman rather than force a vote, via the reconciliation process, on a decent progressive health care bill.
“The only non-negotiable principle is success,” Emanuel likes to say. But that’s the very definition of being unprincipled. And by being unprincipled, he’s delivered defeat.
On the economy, the all-important issue, Emanuel urged Obama to disregard the advice of Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz, two Nobel Prize-winning liberal economists, who publicly predicted that we’d have 10 percent unemployment by now if Obama didn’t propose a bigger stimulus package last spring. Emanuel and Obama’s other political advisers said the pricetag was too high.
Now Obama is paying for it.
Of course, Obama chose Emanuel for the job, and Emanuel may only be guilty of carrying out his boss’s wishes.
But Obama can’t fire himself. And he needs a chief of staff with the wisdom to help point him down a bold, progressive path. The Emanuel path is a dead end.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine. To subscribe for just $14.97 a year, just click here.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
Arun Gupta and Michelle Fawcett | We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
Breanna Lembitz | I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
Ed Rampell | The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
Stephanie Fairyington | March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Ruth Conniff at the People's Legislature in Madison
Standing for Justice at the Capitol. Matthew Rothschild.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
Feb. 18, 5:30 p.m.
Ruth Conniff, Progressive Principles Conference at Yale University 11-1
Read more >>
Thursday February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
VandeBurg Room, Pyle Center. Madison, WI
Not Just Gandhi: The Tradition of Nonviolence Among Muslims in South Asia
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>
Friday February 17 at 7:30 p.m. Kate Clinton at the Barrymore with Michael Feldman in Madison.
Thursday February 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Garden Key Room, Student Union, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>








Comments
Ah yes, the 'Kool Aide" label, directly parroted from your mind controllers.
Never much cared for Kool Aide, even when I was small.
No name calling.
Try addressing the questions -- but you can't explain
why bldgs, designed to withstand hits from airliners, come down within minutes of each other, after having jet fuel fires, which were consumed within minutes, and not ever reaching high enough temps to melt tested steel--- all coming down at near free fall of gravity, defying most laws of physics.
Some rare construction flaw resulting in the collapse?
Then times two, that morning, after being hit by different size jets, at different angles, at differing floors?
And then that pesky problem of Bldg. 7, not hit by an airliner, nor severely damaged.
Yes it was on fire, but bldgs commonly burn for weeks without collapsing on their own footprint at free fall speed. But it came down that afternoon and curiously reported of having collapsed before the fact of it happening.
You want me to send you links to videos of this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3B1OnhSucP8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ybvp6KoVH_E&feature=related
Kool Aide indeed.
No aware intelligent human, would not smell the BS.
Definitely, this issue is the new "Third Rail" of American political discussion, replacing SSI for that title, since now the Dems in power, think it is appropriate to downsize SSI and forego COLAs, while they give themselves fat Cost of Living Adjustments in Congress.
And, this was probably a key ingredient in the Game Plan, so I understand why it gets you guys worked up,
trying in vain to shut us up , finally left with only "Name Calling" as a device.