Obama at Copenhagen

President Obama didn’t do enough at Copenhagen to meet the legitimate demands of developing nations, especially the poorest of the poor. And while he deserves credit for moving the United States back in a positive direction on global warming after eight years of the know-nothingism of George W. Bush, he has adopted some of Bush’s scolding-parent tone.
The Obama administration has its own self to blame for much of the acrimony in Copenhagen.
His administration flat-out rejected the idea of the industrialized nations paying reparations to the rest of the world for the damage they’ve inflicted on the planet.
Nor did the Obama Administration offer nearly enough to developing nations to encourage them to use non-polluting technologies. Obama promised $10 billion by the year 2012. That comes to just 0.28 percent of the U.S. budget for next year.
Then, seeming to act in a generous manner while actually behaving like a bully, he said he would “engage in a global effort to mobilize $100 billion in financing by 2020, if – and only if –it is part of a broader accord” to his liking.
As he did in Oslo for the Nobel Peace Prize, in Copenhagen Obama talked about the United States doing the right thing not just because it’s right but because it’s in Washington’s “self-interest.”
In Oslo, he said rebuilding Europe, Japan, and South Korea after World War II was in the “enlightened self-interest” of Americans.
In Copenhagen, he said, “We’re convinced, for our own self-interest, that the way we use energy . . . is essential to our national security.”
Yet there comes a time when doing the right thing can’t always be squared with American selfishness. That time is now.
It was, after all, American selfishness and gluttony that polluted much of the earth. And now, American stinginess is preventing the kind of cleaning up that is necessary.
On global warming, the United States should do what is just – and not simply what is in its “self-interest.”
Washington should pay reparations to those nations that contributed least to global warming but that are suffering, and will be suffering, the most because of it. This sum should exceed the measly $10 billion Obama has offered developing nations to go green and go clean.
If Obama had made such a generous offer, he would have been greeted more favorably in Copenhagen.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
Arun Gupta and Michelle Fawcett | We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
Breanna Lembitz | I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
Ed Rampell | The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
Stephanie Fairyington | March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Ruth Conniff at the People's Legislature in Madison
Standing for Justice at the Capitol. Matthew Rothschild.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
Feb. 18, 5:30 p.m.
Ruth Conniff, Progressive Principles Conference at Yale University 11-1
Read more >>
Thursday February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
VandeBurg Room, Pyle Center. Madison, WI
Not Just Gandhi: The Tradition of Nonviolence Among Muslims in South Asia
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>
Friday February 17 at 7:30 p.m. Kate Clinton at the Barrymore with Michael Feldman in Madison.
Thursday February 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Garden Key Room, Student Union, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>








Comments
And let us not forget the millions, AlGore's family
made, with their long association and friendship with
that "Commie", Armand Hammer. Coincidence?
There is "Stasis" with Climate, and that would be a continuing state of cyclic change.
At any rate, if you dig into the writings coming out
of the "Club of Rome " group, going back years, you would find definitive statements to the effect of making a Religion out of Environmentalism.
Also, if you check into it, some of the original founders of that "group", resigned when a decision was reached to integrate the "Club of Rome" with the Elitists and their agendas.
Same thing with one of the sincere founders of GreenPeace, who got out when it became infested with Commies.
Anyway, I do not think the description of these Post Modern Environmentalist, as Religious Zealots, is off the mark, as they have been programed as such for years.
Social Engineering has been practiced for years by
various NPO's and other NGO's.
And of course, the Funders of such Organizations,
are the usual culprits, same as it has been for at least 120 years.
Yes Virginia, there is an "Agenda Clause".
But have you ever wondered, why there always seems to be a "Big Fat Capitalist Pig" behind all this so called Socialism?
It is all about conning the peeps into a "Command and Control" system, and I still say this is much more akin to Fascism, as I would say it always is.
I use the term Commie, a term I feel that is as good as the next, due to my belief that it is all the same Beast.
Seems that they are imagining, that their labors are coming to fruition, and they are now making their move, for sure.
We are not out of the woods yet, I'd say, with
this AGW BS --- perhaps we have the hope that, as they were busy Dumbing Down the Masses, thru various means, they have Dumbed themselves down in the process, also.
As to Matthew?
So I guess you would place him in category #1, as I listed?