The Unacceptable Senate Bill

Howard Dean is right: Let’s ditch the Senate health care bill.
Without a public option, and without a Medicare buy-in for people 55 to 65, the bill doesn’t do nearly enough.
A better approach, as Dean suggested, would be for the Senate to take up the House bill and vote it up or down under the rules of reconciliation, so that only a 51 majority is needed.
But Harry Reid isn’t up for that. Nor is the Obama Administration.
Let’s remember how we got in this fix.
Barack Obama and Rahm Emanuel bollixed this thing from the start.
Instead of proposing their own plan, they tossed the whole ball to Congress.
They took single-payer off the table. (Senator Bernie Sanders, to his great credit, took to the Senate floor on Wednesday to propose a single-payer amendment. See http://sanders.senate.gov.)
They didn’t even propose Medicare for All Who Want It, even though 60 percent or more of the American public want it.
Instead, they continually pooh-poohed the public option.
And they focused all their political attention on Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and now the execrable Joe Lieberman.
They could have chosen a different path.
They could have insisted on Medicare for All Who Want It, and they could have rallied the American people to come to Washington and lobby their legislators for it.
In short, they could have used a grassroots strategy of empowerment.
But they opted for a Washington strategy of appeasement.
And so, as Governor Dean realized, we’re left with a very unacceptable outcome.
Postscript: On December 16, Sen. Bernie Sanders wanted to introduce the first single-payer health care legislation ever to be discussed on the floor of the Senate but Republican Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma forced the Senate clerk to read the entire 767-page amendment out loud, thus bringing all Senate work to a halt. Coburn crowed about this on his website.
After a couple of hours, Sen. Sanders pulled his amendment so the Senate could go back to work.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
CURRENT ISSUE: JUNE 2012
Cecile Richards
Ruth Conniff | "Millions of women are counting on us for care. And if we're gone, there's no one else there," says the head of Planned Parenthood.
What's at Stake in Wisconsin
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild | Much more than Scott Walker's future hangs in the balance.
The Mother of Midwifery
Eleanor J. Bader | Ina May Gaskin has delivered more than 1,200 babies and revolutionized the field.
Scott Walker, the Monster.
See more at http://www.zinasaunders.com -- On June 5th, the voters of Wisconsin will decide whether to recall Scott Walker, the monster created by an unholy alliance between the radical right and big business, who has made attacking unions the hallmark of his administration. Cover for The Progressive magazine June 2012: http://www.progressive.org
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
June 4, Madison, WI
Terry Tempest Williams on "The Power of Voice"
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild on
"What's at Stake in the Recall."
5:30-7:30 pm at the Lakeside St. Coffee House, 402 W. Lakeside St, Madison.
It's a fundraiser for The Progressive. Contributions are tax-deductible.
If you can't make it but would like to contribute anyway, please send your check to The Progressive, 409 E. Main St., Madison, WI 53703.










Comments
All people deserve wealthy life time and credit loans or bank loan can make it much better. Just because people's freedom is based on money state.