The Unacceptable Senate Bill

Howard Dean is right: Let’s ditch the Senate health care bill.
Without a public option, and without a Medicare buy-in for people 55 to 65, the bill doesn’t do nearly enough.
A better approach, as Dean suggested, would be for the Senate to take up the House bill and vote it up or down under the rules of reconciliation, so that only a 51 majority is needed.
But Harry Reid isn’t up for that. Nor is the Obama Administration.
Let’s remember how we got in this fix.
Barack Obama and Rahm Emanuel bollixed this thing from the start.
Instead of proposing their own plan, they tossed the whole ball to Congress.
They took single-payer off the table. (Senator Bernie Sanders, to his great credit, took to the Senate floor on Wednesday to propose a single-payer amendment. See http://sanders.senate.gov.)
They didn’t even propose Medicare for All Who Want It, even though 60 percent or more of the American public want it.
Instead, they continually pooh-poohed the public option.
And they focused all their political attention on Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and now the execrable Joe Lieberman.
They could have chosen a different path.
They could have insisted on Medicare for All Who Want It, and they could have rallied the American people to come to Washington and lobby their legislators for it.
In short, they could have used a grassroots strategy of empowerment.
But they opted for a Washington strategy of appeasement.
And so, as Governor Dean realized, we’re left with a very unacceptable outcome.
Postscript: On December 16, Sen. Bernie Sanders wanted to introduce the first single-payer health care legislation ever to be discussed on the floor of the Senate but Republican Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma forced the Senate clerk to read the entire 767-page amendment out loud, thus bringing all Senate work to a halt. Coburn crowed about this on his website.
After a couple of hours, Sen. Sanders pulled his amendment so the Senate could go back to work.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
Arun Gupta and Michelle Fawcett | We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
Breanna Lembitz | I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
Ed Rampell | The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
Stephanie Fairyington | March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Ruth Conniff at the People's Legislature in Madison
Standing for Justice at the Capitol. Matthew Rothschild.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
Feb. 18, 5:30 p.m.
Ruth Conniff, Progressive Principles Conference at Yale University 11-1
Read more >>
Thursday February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
VandeBurg Room, Pyle Center. Madison, WI
Not Just Gandhi: The Tradition of Nonviolence Among Muslims in South Asia
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>
Friday February 17 at 7:30 p.m. Kate Clinton at the Barrymore with Michael Feldman in Madison.
Thursday February 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Garden Key Room, Student Union, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>








Comments
It all makes me so incredibly angry. The thing that is most grotesque is the way people are manipulated into suspicion of and opposition to the things that are most in their interest. Here's what the sheep have to say:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOSUlOQV0ak