The Unacceptable Senate Bill
Howard Dean is right: Let’s ditch the Senate health care bill.
Without a public option, and without a Medicare buy-in for people 55 to 65, the bill doesn’t do nearly enough.
A better approach, as Dean suggested, would be for the Senate to take up the House bill and vote it up or down under the rules of reconciliation, so that only a 51 majority is needed.
But Harry Reid isn’t up for that. Nor is the Obama Administration.
Let’s remember how we got in this fix.
Barack Obama and Rahm Emanuel bollixed this thing from the start.
Instead of proposing their own plan, they tossed the whole ball to Congress.
They took single-payer off the table. (Senator Bernie Sanders, to his great credit, took to the Senate floor on Wednesday to propose a single-payer amendment. See http://sanders.senate.gov.)
They didn’t even propose Medicare for All Who Want It, even though 60 percent or more of the American public want it.
Instead, they continually pooh-poohed the public option.
And they focused all their political attention on Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and now the execrable Joe Lieberman.
They could have chosen a different path.
They could have insisted on Medicare for All Who Want It, and they could have rallied the American people to come to Washington and lobby their legislators for it.
In short, they could have used a grassroots strategy of empowerment.
But they opted for a Washington strategy of appeasement.
And so, as Governor Dean realized, we’re left with a very unacceptable outcome.
Postscript: On December 16, Sen. Bernie Sanders wanted to introduce the first single-payer health care legislation ever to be discussed on the floor of the Senate but Republican Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma forced the Senate clerk to read the entire 767-page amendment out loud, thus bringing all Senate work to a halt. Coburn crowed about this on his website.
After a couple of hours, Sen. Sanders pulled his amendment so the Senate could go back to work.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
| We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
| The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
| March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Comments
The result is similar; the need for a supermajority is overturned. It's fairly easy to see how Bush's across the board tax cuts were revenue bills. Less so for a government takeover of health care. Perhaps you recall how Matt and the boys felt about the nuclear option for judges. Now Matt wants to nationalize a large segment of the economy and doesn't feel it should require 60 Senate votes. It's ok for him to change his reasoning depending on which way the wind is blowing, but it is hypocritical.
.