Crunch Time for Planet Earth
It’s crunch time for Planet Earth.
The climate change negotiations in the run-up to the Copenhagen summit seem to be deadlocked.
“America indicated yesterday that a legally binding agreement was probably impossible, and acceptance is growing among both rich and poor countries that no binding deal will be reached in Copenhagen next month, and that talks could drag well into 2010 or beyond,” The Guardian reports.
The problem is that the West and developing countries are at loggerheads over who needs to make big emission cuts at this stage, and whether there should be a large compensatory fund for poorer nations to help with a transition to green technologies.
The stance of the developing world makes a lot of sense. After all, as Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, enlightened me, the rise in world temperatures is almost all the rich nations’ fault, since it’s due to combined greenhouse gas emissions since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution.
“Remember, the problem has been caused not by today’s emissions or the last twenty-five years of emissions; it’s been caused by cumulative emissions beginning with industrialization,” he told me. “The role of the industrial countries is paramount in having contributed to human-induced climate change.”
Not surprisingly, both Pachauri and his organization are strong backers both of the concept of “differentiated responsibility” (that the obligation of rich and poor nations to fight climate change is very dissimilar) and of a compensatory mechanism to help the developing world cope with the financial burden.
But the Obama Administration has been disappointing on global warming, lowballing on its financial commitment to help poor countries, and claiming that it can’t make big pledges on cutting emissions since progress on this front depends on congressional action.
“What we’re actually seeing … has been extraordinarily destructive behavior on the part of the U.S. government, on the part of the Obama Administration, absolutely derailing the climate negotiations in the lead-up to Copenhagen,” says Naomi Klein. “Developing countries are absolutely shocked by what U.S. climate negotiators have done.”
Well, at least the Obama Administration’s excuse about Congress’s inactivity is being taken away. A Senate panel just approved a bill (with a complete Republican boycott) that aims to cut emissions by 20 percent from 2005 levels by 2020. It will now have to face a full Senate vote, and will have to be reconciled with a slightly less ambitious House bill. While flawed and not far-reaching enough (there is too much faith in the market “cap-and-trade” mechanism, for instance), these are at least steps in the right direction.
Meanwhile, the American public is in full denial mode about basic science.
“There has been a sharp decline over the past year in the percentage of Americans who say there is solid evidence that global temperatures are rising,” states a Pew poll released last month. “And fewer also see global warming as a very serious problem—35 percent say that today, down from 44 percent in April 2008.”
As if that’s not startling enough, the percentage of Americans who believe that global warming is caused due to human activity is also down: from 47 percent last year to 36 percent now. And I thought that the battle to convince people of the immediacy of climate change was over with “An Inconvenient Truth.”
Know-nothings like the National Review’s Jonah Goldberg are exultant. (“The notion that America will sacrifice its sovereignty and treasure … to reduce warming by a fraction a century from now is absurd,” he writes.) Obviously, the smart obfuscation campaign by global warming naysayers is working. (“We aren’t saying that climate change isn’t happening, we’re just saying that we can’t be certain.”)
We need to stop being in denial mode and take action to stop the Earth from heating up. If we keep burying our heads in the sand, we’re going to get buried.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
CURRENT ISSUE: JUNE 2012
Cecile Richards
| "Millions of women are counting on us for care. And if we're gone, there's no one else there," says the head of Planned Parenthood.
What's at Stake in Wisconsin
Much more than Scott Walker's future hangs in the balance.
The Mother of Midwifery
Eleanor J. Bader | Ina May Gaskin has delivered more than 1,200 babies and revolutionized the field.
Scott Walker, the Monster.
See more at http://www.zinasaunders.com -- On June 5th, the voters of Wisconsin will decide whether to recall Scott Walker, the monster created by an unholy alliance between the radical right and big business, who has made attacking unions the hallmark of his administration. Cover for The Progressive magazine June 2012: http://www.progressive.org
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
June 4, Madison, WI
Terry Tempest Williams on "The Power of Voice"
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild on
"What's at Stake in the Recall."
5:30-7:30 pm at the Lakeside St. Coffee House, 402 W. Lakeside St, Madison.
It's a fundraiser for The Progressive. Contributions are tax-deductible.
If you can't make it but would like to contribute anyway, please send your check to The Progressive, 409 E. Main St., Madison, WI 53703.
Comments
The same as clothes, why do you always feel the shoe is always a small pair of tory burch shoes, stylist advice to you: Because before you buy not good. Here's a quick shopping malls give you a few seconds are over, how to find your next pair of your own cheap tory burch shoes. In fact, in today's age of advanced industrial high-speed, we have more and more options, cheap fast fashion products and fashion trends of the media "faithful communication" always lure us to buy it "less a pair of cheap tory burch shoes" , unknowingly lost in the bright lights of their own and forget the meaning of fashion. Let everyone know that the moment a pair of tory burch shoes, "the most boom" is not really fashion, it can only be considered to do more fashion followers. The umbrella of shoes is enough for most people, how to choose their own cheap tory burch shoes for a long-term, and very important thing. Good material is first. While a pair of cheap tory burch shoes style is important, but a good measure to better reflect the material quality of your life. Focus on the premise of the material, and hold more attention to the details of the design, if refined enough, not only durable but also to reflect the pursuit of your life and taste. Choose their own cheap tory burch shoes and more shopping to try more. When shopping may wish to put in you will be and the next pair of cheap tory burch shoes with your coat, so you want a good grasp on the kind of temperament, and more multiple choice test, With their own clothes to find your own unique style ???and finally find your own pair of cheap tory burch shoes the next, as control over who the real fashion. About Author ?? Fashion how people find their own next pair of tory burch shoes to fill the shoes inside a small pair of shoes, allow themselves to be true of people leading the fashion, the answer will be announced in here for you. Ken Griffey Comfort to Max 3.5 Grey White Retro Training Shoes ?? This article is free for republishing Published at Ken Griffey Jr II White Red Retro Training Shoes Air Griffeys Women Ken Griffey Jr Shoes Black Blue White Trainning Sports
Shoe laces are usually also referred to as shoe-strings. Shoe laces are simpler to tie when the ends of the laces have the plastic material tips on them. Shoe laces tend to be made by various man-made fibers as well. Shoe laces are made of high quality material. Shoe laces are the very first thing to go on most type of footwear from running to skateboarding. ? Shoe laces are typically required for many types of athletic shoes, boots and footwear. They are suitable with athletic shoes, skates, or any other lace up footwear. Shoe laces can be tied with nearly every method of knot. They are generally tied off towards the top of the running shoe using a simple bow knot. They are often tied in an almost unlimited number of methods. ? ? The flat cross-section of the shoe laces tend to be more comfy incomparison to the shoe laces available in the round cross-section. ? Wider sneakers, or loosening toe straps or shoe laces may relieve the situation. These sorts of shoe laces are very-very common among boat shoes. There are three similar types of shoe laces that are tipped with three different types of aglets. I agree shoe laces are important. ? Shoe laces tend to be much easier to tie up any time the ends of the shoelaces have the plastic material tips on them. For a good number of young people, learning precisely how to tie up shoe laces can be the major task. The original shoe laces are in contrasting colors to provide the brilliant finishing touch to the shoe. Tying shoe laces is a very straightforward process and need to take just a matter of just a few seconds. ? ? Tying your own shoe laces is really a mindless exercise that individuals all do every single day. But what if there was a way to never tie your laces again. If you would like to know the secret to never tying your lace again click hear. ? If ever there is ways to never tie your laces again. If you wish to learn the trick to not ever tying your Nke Air Griffey Max 1 white black varsity red Retro Training Shoes again then just and leave you tying troubles behind. ? ?