Stop the vendetta against ACORN

By John Buell, October 31, 2009

The double standard on ACORN exposes the real underside of American politics: Our democracy is skewed against the voices of the poor.

Some of my best friends have worked for ACORN. They are honest, dedicated and moral individuals who appreciated the mission of this group, which has done so much good for some of our poorest citizens.

So I take it personally when Congress reduces ACORN to an object lesson about the purported immorality of some community organizers.

ACORN isn’t perfect.

Both its loose organizational supervision and occasional zealotry of its organizers have led to abuses.

But Congress has been extremely hypocritical and biased in cutting off federal funds.

When two conservative activists posed as a pimp and a prostitute and with a hidden camera went to a number of ACORN’s tax preparation offices seeking tax counseling, they managed to find a couple of staffers who gave foolish and unprofessional advice. ACORN has since fired those employees.

But that wasn’t enough for Congress. Absent any attempt to assess how widespread such practices are or whether ACORN is striving to monitor its organizers more closely, Congress acted with unprecedented speed and zeroed out ACORN’s funding.

Yet as Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., one of only seven senators to oppose this rush to judgment, pointed out, Congress has no trouble lavishly funding many corporate felons.

The Brattleboro Reformer, a Vermont newspaper, recently observed that Blackwater, a company that has five of its employees facing murder charges in a massacre of Iraqi civilians in 2007, received a $217 million contract from the Obama administration to provide security in Iraq.

In addition, former Halliburton subsidiary KBR got $80 million in contract bonuses to provide electrical wiring in Iraq — wiring that electrocuted 16 soldiers and two contractors.

Nonetheless, Congress has not defunded it.

In order to even the scales of justice, Sanders has proposed legislation to require the Department of Defense to calculate how much it pays companies that commit fraud, and also to make the Pentagon recommend how to penalize contractors that repeatedly cheat the government.

But Republicans still won’t let go of the ACORN bone. On Oct. 26, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said, “Let’s not pretend that ACORN is gone.” And he warned that some of the organization’s affiliates might try to pull a fast one and change their names.

I haven’t heard Issa complain about Blackwater or Halliburton.

The double standard on ACORN exposes the real underside of American politics: Our democracy is skewed against the voices of the poor.

Fordham political scientist Thomas DeLuca points out: “Elections are flawed by the role of money in politics, unwieldy voter registration, holding elections on work days and limiting our choices to only two political parties.” The consequence of these intertwined and reinforcing practices is gaping class inequalities in voter turnout.

Today citizens in the bottom fifth of the income distribution are almost twice as unlikely to vote as those in the top fifth. And increasing voter participation by the poor is one of the goals of ACORN.

If your group is trying to redress vast inequalities in our society, and someone in your group does something wrong, then you’re toast. But if you’re a corporate criminal, our government doesn’t care. In fact, it will reward you with multimillion-dollar contracts.

ACORN’s real mistake was not being a military contractor. Then it would still be getting public money.

John Buell is a columnist for the Bangor Daily News in Maine and co-author (with Tom DeLuca) of “Liars, Cheaters, Evil Doers: Demonization and the End of Civil Discourse in American Politics” (NYU Press, 2005). He can be reached at pmproj [at] progressive [dot] org.

Comments

Hey, Glib Lib Get Real...

As long as you buy the notion that the Haliburtons and Balckwaters are illegitimate and evil (and by extension, corporate America as a whole), as is assumed here, you will have no choice but to accept the old line the left thinks is cool, "by any means necessary" in countering such absolute evil. ACORN is premised on exactly that principle. John Buell soft-peddals its sorry record here in the extreme. It was, just for starters, NOT a "couple of staffers," John, it was five field offices (at least) that okayed disguising the transporting of illegal immigrant minors for purposes of prostitution and tricking the taxpayer into footing the bill.

And these outrages are just the tip of the iceberg, which Congress knows full well, even if the Progressive will not admit it. ACORN has been involved in voter fraud in many states. It also bears some real responsibility for the housing-generated meltdown with its shakedown tactics of forcing mortgage lenders to make tragically risky loans to the poor. And I say "tragic" here to emphasize the fact that the poor have absolutely NOT been helped by ACORN's tactics in this, nor was it really ACORN's goal to help them (which is what the prostitution ring sting really proves). Instead the poor given risky loans were plunged in over their head and are in many cases losing out badly now. They'd have been much better off renting. But ACORN does not care because it is mainly following the Piven-Cloward tactic of "heightening the contradictions," and I am sure John Buell knows what I mean even if you do not. If the entire system itself (including its constitutional checks and balances and legal constraints) can be seen to be stacked against the poor, then no solid principles need be adhered to in operating within that system against that system.

Submitted by JonBurack on Tue, 11/03/2009 - 7:38am.

CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012

February 2012

Progressive Matt

The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House