Stop the vendetta against ACORN

The double standard on ACORN exposes the real underside of American politics: Our democracy is skewed against the voices of the poor.
Some of my best friends have worked for ACORN. They are honest, dedicated and moral individuals who appreciated the mission of this group, which has done so much good for some of our poorest citizens.
So I take it personally when Congress reduces ACORN to an object lesson about the purported immorality of some community organizers.
ACORN isn’t perfect.
Both its loose organizational supervision and occasional zealotry of its organizers have led to abuses.
But Congress has been extremely hypocritical and biased in cutting off federal funds.
When two conservative activists posed as a pimp and a prostitute and with a hidden camera went to a number of ACORN’s tax preparation offices seeking tax counseling, they managed to find a couple of staffers who gave foolish and unprofessional advice. ACORN has since fired those employees.
But that wasn’t enough for Congress. Absent any attempt to assess how widespread such practices are or whether ACORN is striving to monitor its organizers more closely, Congress acted with unprecedented speed and zeroed out ACORN’s funding.
Yet as Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., one of only seven senators to oppose this rush to judgment, pointed out, Congress has no trouble lavishly funding many corporate felons.
The Brattleboro Reformer, a Vermont newspaper, recently observed that Blackwater, a company that has five of its employees facing murder charges in a massacre of Iraqi civilians in 2007, received a $217 million contract from the Obama administration to provide security in Iraq.
In addition, former Halliburton subsidiary KBR got $80 million in contract bonuses to provide electrical wiring in Iraq — wiring that electrocuted 16 soldiers and two contractors.
Nonetheless, Congress has not defunded it.
In order to even the scales of justice, Sanders has proposed legislation to require the Department of Defense to calculate how much it pays companies that commit fraud, and also to make the Pentagon recommend how to penalize contractors that repeatedly cheat the government.
But Republicans still won’t let go of the ACORN bone. On Oct. 26, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said, “Let’s not pretend that ACORN is gone.” And he warned that some of the organization’s affiliates might try to pull a fast one and change their names.
I haven’t heard Issa complain about Blackwater or Halliburton.
The double standard on ACORN exposes the real underside of American politics: Our democracy is skewed against the voices of the poor.
Fordham political scientist Thomas DeLuca points out: “Elections are flawed by the role of money in politics, unwieldy voter registration, holding elections on work days and limiting our choices to only two political parties.” The consequence of these intertwined and reinforcing practices is gaping class inequalities in voter turnout.
Today citizens in the bottom fifth of the income distribution are almost twice as unlikely to vote as those in the top fifth. And increasing voter participation by the poor is one of the goals of ACORN.
If your group is trying to redress vast inequalities in our society, and someone in your group does something wrong, then you’re toast. But if you’re a corporate criminal, our government doesn’t care. In fact, it will reward you with multimillion-dollar contracts.
ACORN’s real mistake was not being a military contractor. Then it would still be getting public money.
John Buell is a columnist for the Bangor Daily News in Maine and co-author (with Tom DeLuca) of “Liars, Cheaters, Evil Doers: Demonization and the End of Civil Discourse in American Politics” (NYU Press, 2005). He can be reached at pmproj [at] progressive [dot] org.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Tags:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
Arun Gupta and Michelle Fawcett | We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
Breanna Lembitz | I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
Ed Rampell | The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
Stephanie Fairyington | March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Ruth Conniff at the People's Legislature in Madison
Standing for Justice at the Capitol. Matthew Rothschild.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
Feb. 18, 5:30 p.m.
Ruth Conniff, Progressive Principles Conference at Yale University 11-1
Read more >>
Thursday February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
VandeBurg Room, Pyle Center. Madison, WI
Not Just Gandhi: The Tradition of Nonviolence Among Muslims in South Asia
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>
Friday February 17 at 7:30 p.m. Kate Clinton at the Barrymore with Michael Feldman in Madison.
Thursday February 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Garden Key Room, Student Union, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>








Comments
This article is the equivalent to being in 1930's Germany and writing an Article entitled "Stop the Vendetta against Hitler's SA Brown Shirts" following the "Night of the Long Knives".
History teaches us that the "Ideologically Pure"
are the first to go after their man is in power.
You are right tho, if they were a Military Contractor
, Obama would still be giving them money and support.
And yes, definitely a double standard, but Acorn
scared me as much as Blackwater and Halliburton still do, but the latter hold the "Real Ideology" and not the former's "Pretense" that helped the current gang into power.