House Dems Warp Financial Oversight Board

I was reading the business pages of the New York Times today, and I caught an article at the bottom of Page B3 entitled “Vote Backs a Financial Oversight Body.”
And I thought, great, finally, we’re going to get some much-needed regulation of the banks.
But then I read the fine print.
And it turns out there’s less here than meets the eye.
And that’s because, as the article noted, “a group of Democrats [in the House] with close ties to the banking industry” succeeded in diluting the bill in Barney Frank’s Financial Services Committee.
Originally, the bill would have granted wide authority to the states to regulate banks more vigorously than the federal government has been doing.
But the Democrats in the back pocket of the banks, along with Republicans in the front pocket, didn’t want those pesky states to be able to tell the banks what to do.
So they tried to outlaw entirely the rights of states to impose stiffer regulations.
The House ultimately compromised by allowing the Comptroller of the Currency to override the state regs if they are “significantly” at odds with the federal regs.
Well, what does “significantly” mean?
And why should the Executive Branch be the one to decide this issue?
We’ve seen the catastrophic results that ensue when the Executive Branch is the final word on bank regulation.
Michael Hirsh of Newsweek points out another warping of the bill by the House Democrats. Turns out that Wall Street will still be able to trade some derivatives in the dark.
“Thanks to weeks of intense pressure from Wall Street banks and their customers in corporate America, the bill that was approved on Thursday by Rep. Barney Frank's Financial Services Committee is riddled with exceptions and loopholes, many critics say,” Hirsh wrote. “If it becomes law, Wall Street's finest could be driving truckloads of new derivatives products through those loopholes for years to come.”
So, after Wall Street destroyed the U.S. economy by gambling on derivatives, the Democrats in Congress still are failing to muster the necessary backbone to thoroughly regulate them.
What Sen. Durbin said of Congress a few months ago is still true today: “The banks own this place.”
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
Arun Gupta and Michelle Fawcett | We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
Breanna Lembitz | I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
Ed Rampell | The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
Stephanie Fairyington | March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Ruth Conniff at the People's Legislature in Madison
Standing for Justice at the Capitol. Matthew Rothschild.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
Feb. 18, 5:30 p.m.
Ruth Conniff, Progressive Principles Conference at Yale University 11-1
Read more >>
Thursday February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
VandeBurg Room, Pyle Center. Madison, WI
Not Just Gandhi: The Tradition of Nonviolence Among Muslims in South Asia
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>
Friday February 17 at 7:30 p.m. Kate Clinton at the Barrymore with Michael Feldman in Madison.
Thursday February 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Garden Key Room, Student Union, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>








Comments
Senator Durbin is right the banks and corporate America own congress lock stock and barrel. After looking at Michael Moore's movie Capitalism: a love story and then to come home and read this make me mad as hell. As a left wing progressive I feel that we have to keep pushing president Obama to make real inroads on the matter of corporate corruption. I've called, written letters, visited my senator and congressman but they seem to be in bed with the corporations so much that they don't really hear the people.