Chomsky Banned in Guantánamo
That’s right. A book by the leading leftwing intellectual in America is verboten in the prison library there.
Though the library has 16,000 books, according to the Miami Herald, and though some of them deal with politics and current events, a book of Chomsky’s essays post 9/11 was expressly denied to a Guantánamo prisoner.
All of those essays were op-eds that Chomsky had originally written for the New York Times syndicate.
A spokesperson for the prison said “force protection reasons” precluded him from discussing the matter, but he confirmed that not a single copy of any Chomsky book was in the library.
Chomsky was his usual matter-of-fact self. “This happens sometimes in totalitarian regimes,” he told the Miami Herald.
But it shouldn’t happen at Guantánamo.
Nor should such censorship happen in U.S. prisons here at home.
Every once in a while a prisoner sends me a note telling me that the warden wouldn’t let him read The Progressive magazine.
We’re supposed to believe in free speech in this country.
And it seems to me that when we’ve taken every other freedom away from a prisoner, that the least we can do is not imprison that person’s mind.
That is, as Noam Chomsky said, a totalitarian impulse.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Tags:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
| We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
| The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
| March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Comments
Okay, Josip, I agree.
Chomsky is not a Holocaust denier. He just aids and abets them -- as in his support for Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson. Chomsky is too much of a coward to adopt the pretense of Holocaust denial directly, so he seeks to benefit from it with the even bigger pretense of Holocaust denial denial, thereby covering his tracks. And lets be clear. Pretense is all any Holocaust denier ever engages in. NO ONE actually denies the Holocaust, or could. Every Holocaust denier knows full well that what he pretends to deny actually happened. So Chomsky's pretense is just one pretense removed from Faurisson's. To me it's a distinction without a difference.