Bernie Sanders vs. Barack Obama on Wall Street

On Saturday, I heard Senator Bernie Sanders speak about the criminal acts that occurred on Wall Street, which created last year’s crash.
Sanders said he wanted to see some of the criminals behind bars.
And he also said he was sick of the expression “too big to fail.” If banks are too big to fail, he said, they’re too big to exist. So he demanded that we dismantle them into smaller units.
Two days later, Barack Obama went to New York to give his big speech on financial reform.
Unlike Sanders, Obama didn’t threaten Wall Street execs with jail.
And he didn’t talk about busting up the bank holding companies.
He even praised the “Administration”—that would be George W. Bush and Henry Paulson—for taking the “difficult but necessary actions” once the crisis hit. I assume he includes in that praise the obscene bailout of the banks they designed with virtually no strings attached.
And Obama praised his current team of Geithner and Summers, et al.
He also genuflected on the altar of the free market. “I have always been a strong believer in the power of the free market,” he bleated. “I believe that jobs are best created not by government, but by businesses and entrepreneurs willing to take a risk on a good idea. I believe that the role of government is not to disparage wealth, but to expand its reach.”
Those sentences could just as easily tripped off the tongue of George W. Bush or Ronald Reagan.
Obama did excoriate Wall Street for the “reckless behavior and unchecked excess that was at the heart of this crisis, where too many were motivated only by the appetite for quick kills and bloated bonuses.”
And Obama did get around to urging stronger rules of the road and tighter regulation of Wall Street, which we really need.
As he put it, “we should not be forced to choose between allowing a company to fall into a rapid and chaotic dissolution that threatens the economy, or alternatively, forcing taxpayers to foot the bill.”
But his proposals have been around for months now, and there’s no progress being made on Capitol Hill, which the Democrats ostensibly control but Wall Street appears to have conquered.
So Obama was left to plead for more individual responsibility on the part of Wall Street CEOs.
But pleading won’t get it done.
Because they still are motivated by the quick kill and the bloated bonus.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
CURRENT ISSUE: JUNE 2012
Cecile Richards
Ruth Conniff | "Millions of women are counting on us for care. And if we're gone, there's no one else there," says the head of Planned Parenthood.
What's at Stake in Wisconsin
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild | Much more than Scott Walker's future hangs in the balance.
The Mother of Midwifery
Eleanor J. Bader | Ina May Gaskin has delivered more than 1,200 babies and revolutionized the field.
Scott Walker, the Monster.
See more at http://www.zinasaunders.com -- On June 5th, the voters of Wisconsin will decide whether to recall Scott Walker, the monster created by an unholy alliance between the radical right and big business, who has made attacking unions the hallmark of his administration. Cover for The Progressive magazine June 2012: http://www.progressive.org
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
June 4, Madison, WI
Terry Tempest Williams on "The Power of Voice"
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild on
"What's at Stake in the Recall."
5:30-7:30 pm at the Lakeside St. Coffee House, 402 W. Lakeside St, Madison.
It's a fundraiser for The Progressive. Contributions are tax-deductible.
If you can't make it but would like to contribute anyway, please send your check to The Progressive, 409 E. Main St., Madison, WI 53703.










Comments
7rkHd2 dhoheeilndxc, [url=http://orygbriavxop.com/]orygbriavxop[/url], [link=http://hkfeamcifdov.com/]hkfeamcifdov[/link], http://mhadizalapew.com/