Bernie Sanders vs. Barack Obama on Wall Street

By Matthew Rothschild, September 15, 2009

On Saturday, I heard Senator Bernie Sanders speak about the criminal acts that occurred on Wall Street, which created last year’s crash.

Sanders said he wanted to see some of the criminals behind bars.

And he also said he was sick of the expression “too big to fail.” If banks are too big to fail, he said, they’re too big to exist. So he demanded that we dismantle them into smaller units.

Two days later, Barack Obama went to New York to give his big speech on financial reform.

Unlike Sanders, Obama didn’t threaten Wall Street execs with jail.

And he didn’t talk about busting up the bank holding companies.

He even praised the “Administration”—that would be George W. Bush and Henry Paulson—for taking the “difficult but necessary actions” once the crisis hit. I assume he includes in that praise the obscene bailout of the banks they designed with virtually no strings attached.

And Obama praised his current team of Geithner and Summers, et al.

He also genuflected on the altar of the free market. “I have always been a strong believer in the power of the free market,” he bleated. “I believe that jobs are best created not by government, but by businesses and entrepreneurs willing to take a risk on a good idea. I believe that the role of government is not to disparage wealth, but to expand its reach.”

Those sentences could just as easily tripped off the tongue of George W. Bush or Ronald Reagan.

Obama did excoriate Wall Street for the “reckless behavior and unchecked excess that was at the heart of this crisis, where too many were motivated only by the appetite for quick kills and bloated bonuses.”

And Obama did get around to urging stronger rules of the road and tighter regulation of Wall Street, which we really need.

As he put it, “we should not be forced to choose between allowing a company to fall into a rapid and chaotic dissolution that threatens the economy, or alternatively, forcing taxpayers to foot the bill.”

But his proposals have been around for months now, and there’s no progress being made on Capitol Hill, which the Democrats ostensibly control but Wall Street appears to have conquered.

So Obama was left to plead for more individual responsibility on the part of Wall Street CEOs.

But pleading won’t get it done.

Because they still are motivated by the quick kill and the bloated bonus.

Comments

Your points , perhaps pro Socialism , are well taken
and true -- if you have Corporate Socialism -- why not
a crumb for us Slaves .
I am of the Moderate stance concerning some small
crumb of a degree of Socialism -- not a Knee Jerk
Conservative sort .
But if faced with an overly controlling and misanthropic mindset government , my fall back position
becomes Rabidly Libertarian .
And as I have posted before -- I am reminded that Thomas Paine came up with lots of Socialist ideas
to go along with his Libertarian beliefs , such as
Social Security , etc . which was his idea .
I could land upon FDR's " New Deal" as a compromise ,
which is exactly what it was in it's time and to this day FDR is Demonized in some camps . Evidence from the period would show that Corporate America was pushing then towards Fascism as the masses were becoming more open to Uncle Joe's Communism .
Now that Uncle Joe and his USSR are gone , unfortunately Fascism is not , even of the Nazi
variety and even with it's philosophical baggage perhaps intact , but for the most part sans Antisemitism .
My primary reason for posting here is to share this crazy belief of mine , that what has been instigated for some time now is in fact good Old Fashioned Fascism -- howbeit with a much better PR team .

Submitted by Rev. JimBo on Tue, 09/15/2009 - 5:24pm.

CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012

February 2012

Progressive Matt

The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House