So Philip Gourevitch Can See the Torture Photos, But We Can’t?

By Matthew Rothschild, May 24, 2009

There’s nothing like the elitism of the elite media.

In the Sunday Times Week in Review section, Philip Gourevitch, editor of the Paris Review, defends Barack Obama’s decision not to release the torture photos.

In the process, he reveals that he himself has seen some of the photos.

“I saw many more pictures than were ever published in the press, including, I believe, many—if not most—of the photos that president would now prefer that you don’t see,” he writes.

He can see them, but we can’t.

He then congratulates himself for not including the photos in the book he wrote about Abu Ghraib on the debatable grounds that “most of the worst things that happened at Abu Graib were never photographed.”

He parrots Obama’s line that release of the photos would “enflame America’s enemies and endanger troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.” But all he musters by way of argument is, “There’s no doubt about it: The policies that the photographs depict have already done terrible damage to America’s cause.”

What’s the logic of that? No one in the press should have published the Abu Ghraib photos?

Besides, if Obama came clean, released the photos, apologized to the world, and then vowed to prosecute not only the torturers but those at the top—Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, and the lawyers who wrote those memos at the Justice Department—then it’s quite possible that the release of the photos would do more good than harm.

But Gourevitch insists that “releasing additional photographs would not be telling us anything that we don’t already know.”

I’m not sure about that, either.

Cheney just gave a speech at the American Enterprise Institute where he heaped praise on the U.S. interrogators. If even one picture showed a U.S. interrogator doing a hideous thing to a detainee, Cheney’s position would be severely undermined.

And since Cheney is Torquemada right now and his popularity is perversely rising, it would be good to have the photos out just to steer us away from his neo-fascist dungeon.

Oddly, Gourevitch wants to focus attention, he says, on those “at the top of the civilian chain of command in Washington.”

Releasing the photos would do just that.

Share: Facebook   Reddit   del.icio.us   ma.gnolia.com   stumbleupon   Technorati   Google   YahooMyWeb   Email   Disqus  

Comments

Guy, I'm sure you can find people in the FBI who agree with you, as I can find those agents who would agree with me.

Meanwhile Obama won't release the memo that agrees with Cheney and me. Figures.

You need to get out and talk to more people. Many family/friends of mine who voted for the messiah now wish they hadn't. The more intelligent of them see how he's putting politics above the well-being of the economy (and in the case of my extended family and friends with sons & daughters in Iraq and Afghanistan, how he's putting politics above the lives of our folks in uniform).

I don't know one McCain supporter who now supports Obama, although we're happy for your disappointment in Obama.

About GM: I said I really like the Camaros, would consider buying one and wished I could have seen a Firebird, but never, EVER will I buy a car from Government Motors, nor will I ever buy a car built by United Auto Workers. My 10 year-old Toyota was made by union workers in California, but they are not the UAW.

Submitted by greg morris on Mon, 05/25/2009 - 6:23pm.