Specter Flees Republican Party Too Late | Are Collins and Snowe Next?

By Matthew Rothschild, April 28, 2009

Arlen Specter’s departure from the Republican Party confirms the obvious. As Specter put it, “The Republican Party has moved far to the right” since the days of Ronald Reagan.

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele unwittingly dotted the “I” in “right” when he denounced Specter for his "left-wing voting record."

Adding an extra heaping of classlessness, Steele said:

“Specter didn't leave the GOP based on principles of any kind. He left to further his personal political interests because he knew that he was going to lose a Republican primary." To top it off, Steele said Republicans "look forward to beating Sen. Specter in 2010, assuming the Democrats don't do it first."

Such disrespectful treatment is sure to distress Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, the two remaining moderate Republican Senators from Maine. Steele had previously threatened to withhold funds from all three of them because they voted for President Obama’s stimulus package.

Pressure on Collins and Snowe to switch parties, or at least become independents, will mount, as Obama and Harry Reid are likely to offer them plums. And even if they don’t bolt like Specter, the Democrats are in a veto-proof position once Al Franken takes his rightful seat.

But before you fall over backwards cheering Arlen Specter, notice how craven he was back in 2006 during the debate on the Military Commissions Act.

Specter, who fancies himself a constitutional scholar and protector, recognized that the act would deny people their fundamental right of habeas corpus, which goes all the way back to the Magna Carta. During the debate, he introduced an amendment to preserve habeas corpus. Otherwise, he said, the bill will “turn the clocks back 800 years.”

Specter’s amendment failed, and he turned around and voted for the Military Commissions Act anyway.

A true profile in cowardice.

That was the time to switch parties. It’s a little late now.

Comments

Greg

If you would re read my comment you will see that I did give you the "WORST" unemployment during the Reagan years.

Highest unemployment rate under Carter 7.1%
Highest unemployment rate under Reagan 9.6% (these rates are for the entire year)

But since you asked for it here are the "WORST" numbers
from US department of labor web site

Highest unemployment by state from 1976 to the present West Virginia 1984 @ 18.%*
Nation wide 1982 @ 10.8% *

*The problem with unemployment numbers during the Reagan years is they do not include
people who’s unemployment had run out so after 1981 the percentage of unemployed are really higher.

Again as I pointed out before, the Congress was split during all but the last 2 years of the Reagan presidency and even after the Democrats took over the Senate.
A. The final budgets out of congress were only slight different then Reagan.
B. Government grew slightly lower under Reagan then previously administrations.

As I see it the Republican Party has a number of serious problems. Many problems I see illustrate by your comments. They demonize the opposition and take positions with no consideration for facts or any "intellectual honesty"

(Are you going to show me how the economy boomed under Reagan ? or can I just call your comment another example of a Republican being intellectually dishonest.)

People will continue to leave the Republican party fed up with lies and pettiness. Its a shame because American needs two strong political parties.

Submitted by GuyP on Thu, 04/30/2009 - 12:49pm.

CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012

February 2012

Progressive Matt

The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House