Specter Flees Republican Party Too Late | Are Collins and Snowe Next?

Arlen Specter’s departure from the Republican Party confirms the obvious. As Specter put it, “The Republican Party has moved far to the right” since the days of Ronald Reagan.
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele unwittingly dotted the “I” in “right” when he denounced Specter for his "left-wing voting record."
Adding an extra heaping of classlessness, Steele said:
“Specter didn't leave the GOP based on principles of any kind. He left to further his personal political interests because he knew that he was going to lose a Republican primary." To top it off, Steele said Republicans "look forward to beating Sen. Specter in 2010, assuming the Democrats don't do it first."
Such disrespectful treatment is sure to distress Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, the two remaining moderate Republican Senators from Maine. Steele had previously threatened to withhold funds from all three of them because they voted for President Obama’s stimulus package.
Pressure on Collins and Snowe to switch parties, or at least become independents, will mount, as Obama and Harry Reid are likely to offer them plums. And even if they don’t bolt like Specter, the Democrats are in a veto-proof position once Al Franken takes his rightful seat.
But before you fall over backwards cheering Arlen Specter, notice how craven he was back in 2006 during the debate on the Military Commissions Act.
Specter, who fancies himself a constitutional scholar and protector, recognized that the act would deny people their fundamental right of habeas corpus, which goes all the way back to the Magna Carta. During the debate, he introduced an amendment to preserve habeas corpus. Otherwise, he said, the bill will “turn the clocks back 800 years.”
Specter’s amendment failed, and he turned around and voted for the Military Commissions Act anyway.
A true profile in cowardice.
That was the time to switch parties. It’s a little late now.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
Arun Gupta and Michelle Fawcett | We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
Breanna Lembitz | I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
Ed Rampell | The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
Stephanie Fairyington | March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Ruth Conniff at the People's Legislature in Madison
Standing for Justice at the Capitol. Matthew Rothschild.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
Feb. 18, 5:30 p.m.
Ruth Conniff, Progressive Principles Conference at Yale University 11-1
Read more >>
Thursday February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
VandeBurg Room, Pyle Center. Madison, WI
Not Just Gandhi: The Tradition of Nonviolence Among Muslims in South Asia
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>
Friday February 17 at 7:30 p.m. Kate Clinton at the Barrymore with Michael Feldman in Madison.
Thursday February 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Garden Key Room, Student Union, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>








Comments
Greg
If you would re read my comment you will see that I did give you the "WORST" unemployment during the Reagan years.
Highest unemployment rate under Carter 7.1%
Highest unemployment rate under Reagan 9.6% (these rates are for the entire year)
But since you asked for it here are the "WORST" numbers
from US department of labor web site
Highest unemployment by state from 1976 to the present West Virginia 1984 @ 18.%*
Nation wide 1982 @ 10.8% *
*The problem with unemployment numbers during the Reagan years is they do not include
people who’s unemployment had run out so after 1981 the percentage of unemployed are really higher.
Again as I pointed out before, the Congress was split during all but the last 2 years of the Reagan presidency and even after the Democrats took over the Senate.
A. The final budgets out of congress were only slight different then Reagan.
B. Government grew slightly lower under Reagan then previously administrations.
As I see it the Republican Party has a number of serious problems. Many problems I see illustrate by your comments. They demonize the opposition and take positions with no consideration for facts or any "intellectual honesty"
(Are you going to show me how the economy boomed under Reagan ? or can I just call your comment another example of a Republican being intellectually dishonest.)
People will continue to leave the Republican party fed up with lies and pettiness. Its a shame because American needs two strong political parties.