Obama should offer public health insurance to all

By Ramón Castellblanch, March 13, 2009

President Obama should provide all Americans the choice of a public health insurance plan like Medicare. He shouldn’t just leave us a choice of private insurance companies, none of which could offer decent coverage.

The public health insurance option is attractive for several reasons.

First, it would lead the way in lowering administrative costs. It wouldn’t need to make a profit. It wouldn’t need to pay outsized salaries to administrators. Public health insurance programs have administrative costs nearly 10 percent below those of most private insurance policies, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.

Second, since a public health insurance option would not be under pressure to pay shareholders, it would be more able to invest in quality health care through prevention and in advising doctors about the latest research on the most effective treatments — rather than on the most profitable ones.

Third, the public insurance option would provide beneficiaries with reliable coverage. Private insurers are notorious for dumping people with little notice. For example, a decade ago, when Congress restricted private insurer profiteering in the Medicare program, insurers quickly dropped coverage for millions of seniors. As a result, many were left without access to their doctors and to needed medical care.

Finally, a public plan could be held more accountable for its decisions than private insurers. Choices about what to cover and how to pay providers could be openly debated whereas private insurers often decide behind closed doors which doctors you can see and what treatment costs are reimbursable.

Private insurers know that, if they had to compete fairly with a public option, they would have to offer affordable, high quality, reliable insurance or lose. They could not get away with ripping off the government as they currently do when, according to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, they overcharge it 14 percent to cover Medicare beneficiaries.

So, private insurers have made blocking competition from a public health plan their top priority in this year’s debate over President Obama’s health plan. They will spend millions to influence Congress and the White House to allow them a free hand in looting new federal investments in health insurance.

For those who want an end to exorbitant insurer profits and our country’s long string of health care reform fiascos, it’s time to stand up. We should demand the choice of a public health insurance plan. With it, our country would finally get health care reform that bails out those needing health care, instead of those selling private insurance.

Ramón Castellblanch is an associate professor of health education at San Francisco State University. He can be reached at pmproj [at] progressive [dot] org.

Comments

reef127,

What a sad, typical conservative troll comment. Doctors deserve, and get, great salaries under single payer health care systems. Why should they not? Why not make their educations free as well? If you are afraid, or too greedy to pay for someone else, consider how much you are paying to the shareholders and CEO's of your worthless health insurance company. Consider how little you get back from these payments. There are as many different single payer plans as there are countries using them. Not a single one has ever been disbanded, or reverted to a (non) plan like ours. Their only common feature is that the government picks up the tab. In Germany, there are private insurers, paid from tax revenue, and not permitted to make a profit, other than the generous salaries needed to actually attract talent (unlike, say, wonderful and efficient AIG). If you have, for example, a heart condition, you can change your insurance to a cardiac specialty company. Pediatric or geriatric needs, no problem! Pre-existing conditions become reasons to SWITCH TO and not to be REJECTED FROM insurers. Your comment about the DMV is also ludicrous. Imagine if the DMV had to make a huge profit, and squeeze as much out of every customer as it could, and used any excuse it could find to deny a driver's license or plates to anyone. Imagine if we applied the same free market ideas to fire protection. Cows could again destroy cities by kicking over lanterns. (Well, arsonist bovines might also need a lack of building codes, no doubt needless government red tape in your eyes) Profit in health care by anyone not actually providing the care or directly managing it is simply immoral. Free fire protection, clean water, clean food, health care, education, and physical security are all human rights just like the right to blather on internet blogs and go to any crackpot church you desire, or not. We are humans, not slaves to a money machine. The big conservative lie is that there is not enough of everything to go around. The real culprit in the USA is military spending. Kill this and you kill the health care, Social Security, recession, and climate destruction problems in one fell swoop. This problem killed Rome, and the Soviet Union, (to mention only two) and we don’t appear to have learned a lesson from this.

Submitted by acemoab on Wed, 03/18/2009 - 11:32pm.

CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012

February 2012

Progressive Matt

The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House