Obama's Budget Puts His Money Where His Mouth Is

The ambitious scale of President Obama's budget is exciting for a lot of reasons.
First of all, the President used his first budget proposal to announce a return to the principle of progressive taxation. By rolling back the Bush tax cuts for the very wealthiest, and paying for his ambitious proposals by increasing taxes only on people earning more than $250,000 a year, Obama reverses eight years of government aid to the rich at the expense of the poor and middle class. Closing tax loopholes for hedge fund managers and canceling lucrative subsidies for insurance companies and drug manufacturers are part of the same program.
At the same time, the budget takes on our most serious domestic problems with more than a token effort: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions with a cap and trade program and an ambitious effort to expand access to health care are among the President's most ambitious plans. (How the health care plan will come out is still unclear, with Congress asked to come up with cuts to Medicare and Medicaid's private insurance contracts to pay for the plan.) Significant increases for everything from the Department of Health and Human Services to federally funded science programs also represent a major turn-around in our national priorities.
If Obama seemed to echo some the bipartisan "Third Way" rhetoric progressives grew allergic to during the Clinton Administration in last week's address to a joint session of Congress, his budget proposal is a welcome relief: bold, progressive, and an ideological brush-back to the Republicans.
Nowhere is this more evident than in how the government treats children. Among the most important investments the President makes in his budget is in the area of early childhood education.
During debate on the stimulus package that finally passed both houses of Congress, it looked as though the President's proposed increase for Head Start funding would be cut from over $2 billion to about $1 billion. Instead, the President has restored $1.2 billion in Head Start funding for Early Head Start. Likewise, between the stimulus bill and the budget plan, the Administration increased funding for the Child Care and Development Block Grant by $2 billion, and came up with a $600 million increases in Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which helps children with disabilities and their families.
The Obama budget plan also makes permanent at $2,500 tax credit to help pay for college, increases food aid and affordable housing for families who are hit hardest in the down economy, and expands children's health care.
"The sun is rising and we feel its warmth," says Sheila Skiffington of the Center for Children & Families--http://ccf.edc.org/aboutus/default.asp-- in Boston, Massachusetts. "On the federal level, the staff we interface with are excited. They want to see these programs succeed." Citing the Administration's commitment to quality early childhood education, and particularly the significant increases for the Child Care and Development Block Grant and Head Start, Skiffington says she is very encouraged. Obama gets it that quality early childhood education is crucial, "and that is reflected in his budget," she says.
The investment in child care couldn't come at a more important time, as many states have cut back subsidies for quality child care, even as parents are feeling more squeezed and centers are closing down as families withdraw when they lose jobs and can't afford preschool.
Along with renouncing torture and reopening diplomatic relations with the rest of the world, Obama has scored another moral victory for our country by striving to improve the treatment of our struggling families, and particularly children.
- Login or register to post comments

- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend




Comments
There are two sides of this coin, and frankly, few of us really are purely liberal or purely conservative. Therefore logically you republicans out there - you are just a little liberal at least and vice versa. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth and the truth is where God's will lies. What would Jesus do?
Certainly the rich have more power than the middle class and the poor, and they have taken advantage of this situation by taking the lion's share of the profits by paying the CEO (or funnel for the rich) wages that cannot be for their efforts. Certainly one guy doesn't run a company and often it is run despite their incompetent efforts.
Therefore, since money corrupts people in power, laws had to be created. Capitalism in and of itself allows for this which we saw with the recent Wall Street collapse. People lost their jobs and had nothing to do with creating pretend financial products that were nothing but an unregulated pyramid scheme.
These just laws tax the rich more heavily because of this disparity of power.
Now as a childless woman who pays higher taxes than those blessed with children, this is a different weird twist that is not based on unfair advantages. Oddly enough, I pay much higher taxes without any benefit while those who get the benefit pay lower taxes - the more kids, the less you pay. Now that there is some irony that I would be up for eliminating. I don't mind pitching in a little, but it should be relative to my benefit, which goes for those with less children vs. more children. Plus I am paying for rich kids to go to school too. That's crazy.
Parents are not a downtrodden class. Instead, I see that they are ganging up against those of us who they wrongly think are getting off the hook somehow. Oh yes, not having a family - lucky me. I can't wait until I'm old and taken care of my dying self.