"Feel the Bern" van photo by Bill Lueders

At the last candidate forum before the Iowa caucuses, Hillary Clinton stood, smiling, as as she was made to watch the latest Bernie Sanders television ad. The sweet strains of Simon and Garfunkel’s “America” washed over the audience, as beauty shots of farms and cities, middle-aged couples and adorable kids rolled by. As the song built to a crescendo, the camera panned the faces of Sanders supporters at several of the huge stadium events where he has been packing in record crowds.

“I think that’s great. I think that’s fabulous. I loved it,” Clinton declared. Then she quoted Mario Cuomo: “You campaign in poetry, you govern in prose.”

As the Clinton campaign grew increasingly nervous about the Sanders surge, Clinton and her surrogates were leaning hard on their core message: that Sanders does not have the prosaic governing skills necessary to be an effective President.

Hillary, they insist, is the practical choice.

But the pragmatic arguments against Sanders miss what really matters about his campaign.

The important issue is not whether Sanders, as an individual, is most skilled at the fine art of political deal-making and compromise. What’s notable is the movement he represents, and what the outpouring for him says about Americans’ dreams and aspirations—and the potential for organizing those dreams and aspirations into real political power.  

There is a great populist uprising afoot in our country, on both the left and the right. The Sanders campaign is riding a wave of discontent with policies that favor the top 1 percent, and the sense that, as Senator Elizabeth Warren puts it, “the system is rigged.”

It has been more than a year since the “Warren wing” of the Democratic Party began agitating for a presidential candidate who could carry the banner of Occupy Wall Street, Fight for $15, and the large numbers of voters, especially young people, who see shrinking opportunity and growing inequality as the major issues of 2016.

Bernie Sanders took up that challenge. And in the last year his campaign captured the popular imagination in a way that stunned even the candidate himself.

The hunger for Bernie’s message shows how much the country has changed.

Millennial voters, who have grown up in the post-Reagan era, are not persuaded that “big government” is their enemy. Sanders, with a hefty margin of support among young people, is running as an unapologetic democratic socialist.

One thing his campaign has achieved in the last year was to make “socialism” the most looked-up word on Merriam-Webster’s website in 2015.

Millions of young Americans are open to the idea that the United States should join the rest of the industrialized world in providing universal health care to its citizens. They consider it reasonable to propose that our country, like many countries in Western Europe, make college tuition-free. They are appalled by the obscene wealth of the top 1 percent and want some of that wealth redistributed downward. They are inspired by how Black Lives Matter has exposed police violence, a biased criminal justice system, and other forms of structural racism.

“Today, amid leftwing militancy and racial strife, a liberal era is only just beginning,” Peter Beinart wrote in his piece, “Why America Is Moving Left,” in the January/February issue of The Atlantic.

The Democratic Leadership Council—which throughout the 1990s promoted tax cuts, no increase in the minimum wage, NAFTA, welfare reform, the tough-on-crime policies that led to mass incarceration, and Bill Clinton’s pronouncement that “the era of big government is over”—has closed its doors.

Still, Hillary Clinton and her surrogates argue for “a sensible, achievable agenda,” as she puts it on the campaign trail, over Sanders’s poetic call to arms.

In his New York Magazine essay, “The Case Against Bernie Sanders,” Jonathan Chait writes: “It seems bizarre for Democrats to risk losing the presidency by embracing a politically radical doctrine that stands zero chance of enactment if they win.”

Congress will block Sanders’s idealistic proposals—especially universal health care, Chait argues. So not only is Sanders a danger to Democrats because he might lose, he’s a poor risk because he won’t even be able to achieve his goals should he win.

Hillary is more likely to win because she can appeal to “moderates and conservatives” Chait further elaborated when I joined him recently for a discussion of his article on MSNBC.

But if anything is clear in this crazy political year, it is that incrementalism and a focus-group-driven appeal to swing voters is out of sync with the times. Taking the “safe” route by hewing to the center is a risk in itself, if it leaves the majority of voters uninspired.

Americans are ready for bold proposals. They are fed up with the insider game of politics in Washington. That might mean we are in for a scary, rightwing populist administration, or, as Beinart argues, it might mean that we are headed into a more progressive era. A lot depends on the infrastructure and organization at the grassroots level—the kind of organizing below the surface that propelled the Bernie Sanders surge.

Much of the reason Sanders caught fire is a direct result of an underfinanced and understaffed campaign that relies on grassroots movements more than traditional political infrastructure.

“Instead of asking if it would be dangerous to have a young Latina in Communications Workers for America introduce Bernie in Arizona, they went for it,” notes Steve Cobble, political director and co-founder of Progressive Democrats for America, which launched the Draft Bernie for President movement. “The Clinton campaign would have been more cautious. They were trying not to make a mistake.”

Yolanda Bejarano is the young union organizer who introduced Sanders in Phoenix. Other young activists in the labor and immigrant-rights movements have stood with Sanders at rallies around the country, in contrast with the more high-profile politicians and entertainers who join Clinton on stage.

As a result of this relaxed approach, Cobble points out, Sanders became a vehicle for progressive activists who joined and helped to shape the campaign. They range from Dreamers to Occupy veterans to climate activists led by Sanders' friend Bill McKibben, to single-payer advocates including National Nurses United and the grassroots activists for fair wages and fair trade around the country who formed Labor for Bernie.

Sanders’s appeal as a truth-teller who is not beholden to Wall Street or corporations was always clear. But the momentum his campaign would build was not.

“It was unpredictable,” says Cobble. “No one saw this folk hero thing coming.”

Millions of voters see  Sanders as the candidate who best articulates their aspirations for a more just society.

So now what?

Both Barack Obama, through Organize for America, and Ralph Nader, through the Green Party, promised that their presidential campaigns would leave behind organizations that would push for progressive values and represent the interests of ordinary Americans against the intimidating infrastructure of money and entrenched power. In neither case did the promise bear fruit.

Organize for America never developed into a vehicle for independent progressive organizing. Instead, it folded into the institutional Democratic Party. And Nader abandoned the Green Party, never helping it grow it into a major third party force.

Sanders has hired Obama campaign veteran Scott Goodstein of Revolution Messaging to run his impressive social media operation. He has also criticized the missed opportunity to build Organize for America into a lasting force for progressive change:

“What Obama did not do," Sanders has said, "is when he got into office, say to the Republicans, 'You're not negotiating with me, you're negotiating with tens of millions of people.'”

Win or lose, the movement Sanders galvanized will help determine our country’s progressive future.

That includes the members of Black Lives Matter who have criticized Sanders for not dealing directly with racism and police violence early on. Sanders has responded by reaching out and trying to bring together the movements for racial justice and economic justice. As Van Jones pointed out in our February issue, there can be no viable progressive movement in America that does not put the concerns of people of color at its center.

In his last pitch to voters in Iowa at the candidate forum at Drake University, Sanders explained his campaign in his simple, direct way, noting that the crises faced by the nation today, including inequity, poverty and a rigged political system, “are so serious that we have got to go beyond establishment politics and establishment economics.”

He did not exactly recite poetry, but he did make a plea to move the political discussion to a higher plane: “In my view, we need a political revolution where millions of people stand up and say, ‘You know what? That great government of ours belongs to all of us, not just the few.’ ”

That’s music to a lot of Americans' ears.

Ruth Conniff is editor-in-chief of The Progressive magazine.

Section: 

Comments

Hypocrite Hillary sold $Billions in arms sales to the Middle East. Will she accept liability for all weapons that have fallen into the wrong hands? Of those 90 people killed daily by gun violence, that includes 22 veteran suicides (1 every 65 minutes) thanks to the Iraq War. Now she wants to send our young men and women into more wars in the Middle East that she has armed to the teeth? For shame.
Its very funny to hear that Hillary can appeal to conservatives. Riotously funny.
Hillary is right about one thing, a President does not sit on a throne and issue edicts. It takes sound counsel to govern. So I'd like a careful look at who she chose when she was Secretary of State. Her girlfriend, Huma, with full unauthorized access to everything, Top Clearance included. Victoria Nuland, wife of a right wing Republican broker cum fund raiser who advised set up the Maiden Square demonstrations in the Ukraine. Sid Blumenthal, a nothing in particular who successfully counseled Hillary to kill Libya. She followed all of the CIA orders. Yet there is a great blank in public knowledge about who the others in Hillary's shadow were. I'd love to see an in-depth article on it, because she certainly wreaked as much damage as Cheney and Rumsfeld. There's every reason to think Bernie woulddo far better than that.
Bernie says "we need a political revolution.' This would be the first revolution in history to have only one man as its entire focus. Bernie has made no effort to build a political movement either in his decades in Vermont or in his current presidential run. Vermont does have a somewhat viable 3rd party -- The Progressive Party -- but Bernie has never been part of it to my knowledge. So when Bernie retires, he will leave behind his personal achievements, but no movement and certainly no revolution to continue the work he started. Precisely the same is true of his presidential run. If the US needs a revolution, then surely we need to organize a political movement capable to creating it. The movement around Bernie is no such movement.
So...Hillary should win the nomination because of her more "realistic" goals. To paraphrase Homer Simpson, when giving advice to Bart: "Never try anything and you won't be disappointed."
VISUALIZE BERNIE TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE. Can you see him there? See him in his black overcoat, signature white hair blowing in the crisp breeze of the bright January day as he raises his right hand and takes the oath, sunlight glinting off his spectacles? Behold the sea of wall-to-wall faces of every color, stretching through the entire Washington Mall and beyond, like it was the historic day of Dr. King’s “I Have A Dream” speech? You pause inwardly to reflect on this moment, and feel your breath expand and relax, somehow knowing, deep down that, yes, he is safe and protected, for the work that needs to be done, for the benefit of all. And now--hear the roar of the exuberant crowd suddenly and solemnly hush? Because it is at this point...you, the assembled thousands, the nation, the world, hears him say the words, in his baritone, Brooklyn accent, "I, Bernard Sanders, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." You literally feel the crowd erupt in a volcano of cheers as Phase II of the Revolution now begins, and you feel your heart burst with joy, a lump in your throat, and tears stream down your face as you find yourself laughing and crying at the same time... It’s Crunch Time people--the Iowa Caucus is upon us! And we’ve gotta pull out ALL the stops--not just the physical (phone banking, etc.), but the mental and spiritual, as well. Sure, it may sound “woo-woo,” but hey, I’m writing this from the San Francisco Bay Area and that’s our specialty! So let’s USE it! First to win Iowa, to jumpstart the momentum, but starting by visualizing the endpoint, fully and emotionally. Do this and feel this as fully as you can between now and the end of the Iowa caucuses--and then beyond! But especially now--let’s light the fire that Spreads the Bern!
Bernie to feel the burn.... you got to “light the fire!” NOW!

Add new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

More

Do Americans, even in anxious times, prefer an optimistic leader or an angry one?

Carolina Panthers

If the black citizens of Charlotte and white supporters of justice block the entrance to the stadium on Sunday, I...

By Wendell Berry

Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front

Love the quick profit, the annual raise,
vacation with pay. Want more 
of everything ready made. Be afraid 
to know your neighbors and to die.
And you will have a window in your head.
Not even your future will be a mystery 
any more. Your mind will be punched in a card 
and shut away in a little drawer.
When they want you to buy something 
they will call you. When they want you
to die for profit they will let you know. 
So, friends, every day do something
that won’t compute. Love the Lord. 
Love the world. Work for nothing. 
Take all that you have and be poor.
Love someone who does not deserve it. 
Denounce the government and embrace 
the flag. Hope to live in that free 
republic for which it stands. 
Give your approval to all you cannot
understand. Praise ignorance, for what man 
has not encountered he has not destroyed.
Ask the questions that have no answers. 
Invest in the millennium. Plant sequoias.
Say that your main crop is the forest
that you did not plant,
that you will not live to harvest.


Say that the leaves are harvested 
when they have rotted into the mold.
Call that profit. Prophesy such returns.
Put your faith in the two inches of humus 
that will build under the trees
every thousand years.
Listen to carrion—put your ear
close, and hear the faint chattering
of the songs that are to come. 
Expect the end of the world. Laugh. 
Laughter is immeasurable. Be joyful
though you have considered all the facts. 
So long as women do not go cheap 
for power, please women more than men.
Ask yourself: Will this satisfy 
a woman satisfied to bear a child?
Will this disturb the sleep 
of a woman near to giving birth? 
Go with your love to the fields.
Lie easy in the shade. Rest your head 
in her lap. Swear allegiance 
to what is nighest your thoughts.
As soon as the generals and the politicos 
can predict the motions of your mind, 
lose it. Leave it as a sign 
to mark the false trail, the way 
you didn’t go. Be like the fox 
who makes more tracks than necessary, 
some in the wrong direction.
Practice resurrection.

Wendell Berry is a poet, farmer, and environmentalist in Kentucky. This poem, first published in 1973, is reprinted by permission of the author and appears in his “New Collected Poems” (Counterpoint).


Public School Shakedown

Progressive Media Project

Newsletter