Anti-immigrant hysteria blocks black access to health care

By Eric Ward, November 10, 2009

By denying health care to the undocumented, the U.S. House of Representatives has unwittingly put blacks at risk.

Under the House health care bill, millions of blacks could potentially be denied federal payments for affordability credits. These credits enable individuals to get subsidized health care if they are under 400 percent of the federal poverty line. Such subsidies do not apply, however, to anyone who is not “lawfully present” in the United States.

But 8.9 percent (or roughly 2 million) of all blacks in the United States do not have a Social Security card, driver’s license, passport, birth certificate or other proof of naturalization. As a result, they could be excluded from accessing federal affordability credits for health care.

A 2006 study by the Brennan Center for Justice found that blacks were more than three times as likely as whites to lack a government-issued photo ID, with one in four blacks possessing no such ID. In 2006, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities highlighted that 8.9 percent — roughly 2 million blacks — don’t have a Social Security card, driver’s license, passport, birth certificate or proof of naturalization.

Part of the problem dates back to the days of Jim Crow, when white hospitals were barred from delivering black babies. In 1950, Sam Shapiro, now emeritus professor of health policy and management at the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, conducted a case study for the journal Population Studies and found that one-fifth of blacks born from 1939-40 were never issued birth certificates.

Jim Crow hospitals did not disappear from some areas of the country until the 1970s. So, many blacks don’t have birth certificates through no fault of their own. They shouldn’t be penalized by losing health care subsidies.

What’s more, excluding these blacks and undocumented immigrants from health care reform puts public health at risk and ends up costing the system more money. Preventive care — rather than expensive trips to the emergency room — is what would save taxpayers’ money in the long run, despite the ill wishes of anti-immigrant zealots.

But to get that care, people must be able to afford their premiums.

The phrase “first, do no harm” is often attributed to the Hippocratic Oath that doctors swear to before practicing medicine on patients. Congress would be doing harm by excluding anyone from health care.

Eric Ward, the national field director for the Center for New Community, writes for the Web site Imagine 2050. He can be reached at pmproj@progressive.org.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Advertising

Arianna Huffington

“We are actually in the middle of a golden age for news consumers,” says the media maven and political commentator.

Standing with Caster

Dave Zirin says gender testing is plain wrong.

On the Poppy Trail

It’s not the Taliban that controls the opium trade.

A Just Cause ≠ A Just War

I want to talk about three holy wars. They aren’t religious wars, but they’re the three wars in American history that are sacrosanct, that you can’t say anything bad about: the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, and World War II.


About

The Progressive Magazine since 1909. Home of Howard Zinn, Barbara Ehrenreich, Ruth Conniff, radio, video, and Matthew Rothschild's McCarthyism Watch.

Since its founding by Sen. Robert La Follette, The Progressive has steadfastly opposed corporate power and reckless U.S. interventionism and has championed peace, women's rights, civil rights, civil liberties, a preserved environment, an independent media, and real democracy.

Copyright 2009, The Progressive Magazine
409 E. Main, Madison, WI 53703