Court should nullify Arizona immigration law
As an immigration attorney and a first-generation Mexican-American, I want the appeals court to overturn Arizona’s SB 1070 law.
Every day, I see families torn apart by the most minor legal infractions.
When a broken taillight is used as a reason to stop and deport an individual, then something is seriously wrong with our law enforcement priorities, our laws and even our morals.
The Arizona law would make life all the more miserable for immigrants from Mexico. It would require law enforcement officers to question anyone they believe to be suspicious looking.
On Nov. 1, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on this law. The court’s decision will send a strong signal not just to Arizona, but also to the 13 other states that are now considering similar laws.
Arizona’s law reminds me of Operation Wetback, when, after the Great Depression, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service expedited the deportation of 80,000 “Mexican-looking” Americans, including many Latinos born in the United States and Native Americans.
We Latinos must beware: Laws that aim to deport the undocumented may jeopardize the civil rights of all Latinos.
In the wake of SB 1070, other states are attempting to pass similar or more extreme laws at an alarming rate.
Republican state Rep. Randy Terrill, who co-authored Oklahoma’s 2007 immigration bill that was later ruled unconstitutional, has promised to pursue an even stricter second one he calls “Arizona-plus.”
Arizona’s Republican state Sen. Russell Pearce recently announced that state legislators would propose a bill to deny U.S. citizenship to children born of undocumented immigrants.
In the current anti-immigrant climate, even President Obama — who during his race for the presidency co-opted the United Farm Workers’ slogan “Yes We Can!” — has turned his back on us. His administration has deported more immigrants than any other since Operation Wetback.
We need comprehensive immigration reform, and we need our elected officials to make it happen.
If they don’t, our judicial branch must uphold the Constitution and throw out these anti-immigration laws that violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process and equal protection clauses.
In the wake of the election results, that may be all we can hope for in the short term.
Laura Sanchez is a staff attorney for the Central American Resource Center (CARECEN) in San Francisco. She can be reached at pmproj [at] progressive [dot] org.
You can read more pieces from The Progressive Media Project by clicking here.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
CURRENT ISSUE: JUNE 2012
Cecile Richards
Ruth Conniff | "Millions of women are counting on us for care. And if we're gone, there's no one else there," says the head of Planned Parenthood.
What's at Stake in Wisconsin
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild | Much more than Scott Walker's future hangs in the balance.
The Mother of Midwifery
Eleanor J. Bader | Ina May Gaskin has delivered more than 1,200 babies and revolutionized the field.
Scott Walker, the Monster.
See more at http://www.zinasaunders.com -- On June 5th, the voters of Wisconsin will decide whether to recall Scott Walker, the monster created by an unholy alliance between the radical right and big business, who has made attacking unions the hallmark of his administration. Cover for The Progressive magazine June 2012: http://www.progressive.org
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
June 4, Madison, WI
Terry Tempest Williams on "The Power of Voice"
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild on
"What's at Stake in the Recall."
5:30-7:30 pm at the Lakeside St. Coffee House, 402 W. Lakeside St, Madison.
It's a fundraiser for The Progressive. Contributions are tax-deductible.
If you can't make it but would like to contribute anyway, please send your check to The Progressive, 409 E. Main St., Madison, WI 53703.









