Government should offer incentives for homes to go green
The federal government should help homeowners go green.
Several states are already seeking ways to encourage homeowners to switch from dirty fuels to cleaner energy sources, kick-starting a green revolution house by house.
In New Jersey, the state Legislature recently passed a bill that would require homebuilders to offer buyers solar energy systems as an option. And the state government provides grants and loans for solar installation on existing housing.
Communities, neighborhood groups and educational facilities in New Mexico are experimenting with solar and biomass systems, and dozens of cities and counties around the country are doing the same.
Take a look at California, where several cities are offering homeowners the opportunity to finance the installation of solar power the same way most public water, sewer or gas-line projects are financed — over a 20-year period to be paid back as a special assessment on a homeowner’s property taxes.
Cities and towns, however, have to get the money to finance these programs. Berkeley, the first city in California to create a public-financing program, turned to the banks for financing. Palm Desert, another California community that offers financing, used its own reserves to get its pilot project off the ground.
But interest in such programs could outstrip the ability of local governments to procure financing, which is why the federal government must step in.
Most states and towns face tight budgets because revenue has become scarce and their budgets, by law, have to be balanced.
Federal money ought to be made available — as it has for energy-efficiency projects and large-scale conversions of the energy grid.
By engaging individual homeowners in going green, we will not only reduce our carbon footprint one household at a time. We will simultaneously be building the larger constituency we’ll need to arrive at our clean energy future.
Hank Kalet is online editor and columnist for The Princeton Packet newspaper group in New Jersey. He can be reached at pmproj [at] progressive [dot] org.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
ELECTION 2012 BLOG
Not everyone is voting in the Wisconsin recall election
Despite estimates this week that turnout for the June 5 recall election could top 60%, there are some Madisonians who do not plan to vote.
Latest Barrett poll has Walker up 50-48
The Wisconsin recall race is a "dead heat," says the Barrett campaign, which released the findings of a poll it conducted May 29 and 30, four days later than the Marquette poll.
The campaign's poll showed Walker up 50-48 over Barrett. The poll was of 821 likely voters and had a margin of error +3.5%. The Barrett campaign says the poll also indicated that the John Doe scandal was hurting Walker. It also noted that "Barrett leads Walker 56-42 among people who did not vote in 2010," so "turnout is key."
Join comedians Chris Lay and Alan Talaga for a Wisconsin recall debate live blog Thursday night
Two of Madison's sharpest political minds, stand-up comedians Chris Lay (@MrChrisLay) and Alan Talaga (@danpotacke), will provide the blow-by-blow analysis right here on Thursday night at 9 p.m. (CDT) during the second of two debates between Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett in advance of the historic recall election on June 5. The debate will be televised in Madison on WKOW, Channel 27, and we urge you to keep at least one eye on this blog while you watch it.
Citizen Dave: If the Milwaukee DA has anything on Walker, he should charge him now
Governor Scott Walker is now paying $160,000 for nothing. The governor has said repeatedly that he is not the target of a John Doe investigation in Milwaukee County, yet his campaign has transferred another $100,000 to his legal defense fund, bringing the total amount dedicated to defend him against nothing to $160,000.
Feingold Revs Up Crowd for Barrett
“I’ve never met a more decent person in or out of politics.” Former Sen. Russ Feingold revved up a crowd at a fundraiser for Tom Barrett on Wednesday night in the recall battle against Gov. Scott Walker.
CURRENT ISSUE: JUNE 2012
Cecile Richards
Ruth Conniff | "Millions of women are counting on us for care. And if we're gone, there's no one else there," says the head of Planned Parenthood.
What's at Stake in Wisconsin
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild | Much more than Scott Walker's future hangs in the balance.
The Mother of Midwifery
Eleanor J. Bader | Ina May Gaskin has delivered more than 1,200 babies and revolutionized the field.
The ED Show - Bill Clinton heads to Wisconsin to campaign against Walker.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
June 4, Madison, WI
Terry Tempest Williams on "The Power of Voice"
Ruth Conniff and Matthew Rothschild on
"What's at Stake in the Recall."
5:30-7:30 pm at the Lakeside St. Coffee House, 402 W. Lakeside St, Madison.
It's a fundraiser for The Progressive. Contributions are tax-deductible.
If you can't make it but would like to contribute anyway, please send your check to The Progressive, 409 E. Main St., Madison, WI 53703.










