Bush politicizes Justice Department
December 6, 2005
We have serious concerns about the Bush administration's commitment to full and fair enforcement of the nation's civil rights laws.
Since its creation under President Eisenhower in 1957, the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department has served as the primary guardian of citizens -- through both Republican and Democratic administrations -- against illegal racial, ethnic and sexual discrimination.
But the Bush administration is infecting the division with an unprecedented level of politicization, which has undermined civil rights enforcement and tarnished the ideal of equal justice under law.
In 2003, eight career Justice Department lawyers, including the chief of the voting section, were assigned to review a high-profile Texas redistricting plan. They unanimously recommended rejecting the plan because of its discriminatory impact. But the political appointees approved the plan -- and in the next election Texas sent five new Republicans to Congress.
Such a decision raises deep concerns about the neutrality of the Department of Justice on the most important and sensitive voting rights issues that it handles.
Similarly, earlier this year the Civil Rights Division approved another controversial state law -- the Georgia voter identification law -- even though career Justice Department lawyers strongly objected to it.
The staff lawyers conducted a thorough factual review of the law, and in an extensive memorandum dated Aug. 25, 2005, they recommended that the Justice Department challenge the law because it was hostile toward African-American voters and it would seriously undermine their right to vote. The very next day, political appointees overruled them. Subsequently, federal courts have enjoined this law as an unconstitutional poll tax, a tactic used in the Jim Crow era to disenfranchise minority voters.
Nor has the Bush administration been straight with Congress about how it is running the Civil Rights Division. During his confirmation hearings in October, Wan J. Kim, now assistant attorney general for civil rights, stated in response to written questions from Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., that "a team of seven career professionals from the Voting Rights Section" had determined that the Georgia law should be approved, even though the Aug. 25 memorandum stated the opposite.
The Civil Rights Division has been diverted from enforcing civil rights laws to attacking programs designed to increase diversity. The Division's employment section recently issued a threat to Southern Illinois University to discontinue its use of graduate fellowships aimed at diversifying a graduate program with less than 8 percent minority participation or face litigation brought by the Department of Justice. The Division took this action at the urging of the so-called Center for Equal Opportunity, a politically conservative organization dedicated to rolling back the enforcement of civil rights in our country.
Hiring practices and the management of career attorneys by political appointees also demonstrate the politicization of the Division. The civil service is designed to be above the fray so that, notwithstanding inevitable changes in political leadership, the federal government will retain employees who will enforce our nation's civil rights laws effectively and without a political agenda.
But during this administration, changes in longstanding department hiring procedures have subverted this process, almost completely eliminating input from career staff and rewarding those willing to follow a political agenda that would eviscerate our historic civil rights laws.
Since 2002, the Bush administration has demoted, formally or informally, at least six longtime career senior managers, who had held their positions through past Republican and Democratic administrations. These employees had long been recognized for vigorously fighting illegal discrimination and for their commitment to balanced and fair civil rights enforcement, no matter who was in power.
By draining a vital workforce of its expertise, seriously lowering the morale of all career staff and undermining the work of career attorneys in the division, the Bush administration has caused many lawyers in the civil rights division to resign. It has then replaced them with new hires with little experience in, or commitment to, civil rights
enforcement.
As a result of this politicization of the Civil Rights Division, the Bush Justice Department is not fully enforcing civil rights laws. During the entire Bush administration, there has not been one Voting Rights Act lawsuit (and only a handful of employment discrimination lawsuits) filed alleging discrimination against African-Americans.
Our nation should not tolerate this assault on fair and balanced law enforcement. To continue and renew our quest for equal justice under law, it is imperative that both the Senate and the House conduct vigorous oversight of the Civil Rights Division and halt this attack on the federal government's most important civil rights enforcement institution.
Equal justice under law is the highest ideal of our justice system. We cannot stand by and let it be brought low.
Marjorie Press Lindblom and Robert E. Harrington are co-chairs of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (www.lawyerscomm.org). They can be reached at pmproj [at] progressive [dot] org.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
Arun Gupta and Michelle Fawcett | We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
Breanna Lembitz | I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
Ed Rampell | The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
Stephanie Fairyington | March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Ruth Conniff at the People's Legislature in Madison
Standing for Justice at the Capitol. Matthew Rothschild.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
"Thurs. Feb. 9, 7:00 p.m., Madison
Ruth Conniff on "The Wisconsin Uprising" MATC Downtown, Rm. D240 (211 N. Carroll St.) Room D240
Sun. Feb. 12, 5:30 p.m., Madison
Matthew Rothschild, "Forward for the First Amendment"
Madison Eastside Club (3735 Monona Dr.)
Thursday February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
VandeBurg Room, Pyle Center. Madison, WI
Not Just Gandhi: The Tradition of Nonviolence Among Muslims in South Asia
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Friday February 17 at 7:30 p.m. Kate Clinton at the Barrymore with Michael Feldman in Madison.
Thursday February 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Garden Key Room, Student Union, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.







