Miers and the Right
October 12, 2005
I’m trying hard to figure out the intensity of the far right’s anger about the Harriet Miers nomination.
Seems unlikely to me, anyway, that Bush and Cheney and Rove would have picked someone who was not a doctrinaire conservative.
So why are the reactionaries reacting so badly?
Because Harriet Miers was not one of their tried and true chosen few.
She hasn’t been out there openly fighting their battles from the trenches or the benches, so they, having been stung by Souter and O’Connor and Kennedy, badly fear being stung again.
They also feel their power slipping away, as Bush’s popularity stays low, his ability to get what he wants in Congress begins to flag, the Iraq War drags on, and indictments loom.
They were depending on Bush to deliver a reactionary bench, and now they fear they won’t be able to accomplish this overriding goal.
Bush’s preachers—especially James Dobson—pledged that he would stack the court with justices committed to overturning Roe. While Dobson may be reassured, many rightwingers feel betrayed.
Which is strange, since Bush has done so much for them.
But part of the betrayal is feeling disrespected: One rightwing fundamentalist leader said it’s like Bush doesn’t want to be seen in public with them.
And part of the betrayal is feeling that Bush has not joined the battle in the way they want: head on.
They crave jihad, and Harriet Miers doesn’t seem like a bomb thrower.
For many rightwing fundamentalists, it’s not enough that they stack the court. They also want justices to berate the rest of us as sinners as they take their seats.
And so, on Sunday, Pat Buchanan was demanding that Harriet Miers must call Roe an “abomination” at her confirmation hearings.
I doubt that will happen.
But Miers is in a bind: If she doesn’t unsheath the anti-abortion sword, she may lose a couple of rightwing Republican Senators. And if she does, she may lose a couple of moderate Republican Senators.
Until the Miers nomination, all Bush had, solidly at his table, was the far right.
He doesn’t even have that now, despite all his catering.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
Arun Gupta and Michelle Fawcett | We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
A Taste of Freedom
Breanna Lembitz | I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Anniversary Blues
Edwidge Danticat | Two years ago in Haiti, the Earth opened, buildings collapsed, and people died—300,000 to be precise. Anniversaries hurt. They brutalize the body. They pummel the spirit.
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Standing for Justice at the Capitol. Matthew Rothschild.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
Thurs. Feb. 9, 7:00 p.m., Madison
Ruth Conniff on
"The Wisconsin Uprising"
MATC Downtown, Rm. D240 (211 N. Carroll St.) Room D240
Sun. Feb. 12, 5:30 p.m., Madison
Matthew Rothschild,
"Forward for the First Amendment"
Madison Eastside Club (3735 Monona Dr.)
Thursday February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
VandeBurg Room, Pyle Center. Madison, WI
Not Just Gandhi: The Tradition of Nonviolence Among Muslims in South Asia
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>
Friday February 17 at 7:30 p.m.
Kate Clinton at the Barrymore with Michael Feldman in Madison.
Thursday February 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Garden Key Room, Student Union, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>
Ruth Conniff at the People's Legislature in Madison









