Republican Dissenters Won’t Dissuade Bush on Iraq

July 6, 2007 By Matthew Rothschild

Even as Bush keeps losing fans among Republicans in the Senate, don’t bet that’s going to change his mind on Iraq.

This man gives stubbornness a bad name.

He’s said in the past that he’s going to stay on course even if the only people supporting him are Laura and Barney.

And I’m not even sure they’re still on board.

But Cheney is, and the two of them have the utmost disdain for the Senate.

What do they care if Senator Lugar, or Voinovich, or Domenici, or Warner clears his throat and utters some faint criticism of the war?

Until these Senators are prepared to vote against continued funding for the war—and none of them are now—Bush and Cheney can go on their bloody way.

Many pundits are in fantasyland about the fabled “wise men” of the party going up to the White House and prevailing on Bush and Cheney. Get over it. Bush and Cheney can’t be budged.

They are unsusceptible to rational argument.

They are unmoved by political calculations, since they’re not running for office in 2008.

And anyway, Bush thinks he’s getting the word from on high to keep plunging ahead with this war.

“His faith is very strong,” said Michael Novak, a conservative theologian who recently met with Bush. He believes he’s “answering to God.”

Bush won’t answer to man until he’s absolutely forced to. That may be a while.

The last time the Senate voted, it was 80-14 to continue funding for Iraq.

Half measures, which some Democrats and Domenici favor, won’t do.

They think that if they fund U.S. troops only for going after Al Qaeda and training the Iraqis and protecting U.S. personnel, they would hasten the end of the war. But they’re fooling themselves. Such legislation would not provide any significant check on Bush’s warmaking.

He and Cheney would simply keep our troops there, anyway, by saying they’re doing what Congress wants: They’re going after Al Qaeda, and training the Iraqis, and protecting U.S. personnel (which means what? The embassy? The oil companies? The contractors?).

It’s going to take a lot more than a few weak cries from Republicans, and some mealy compromise from Democrats, to drag Bush and Cheney—and all our troops—out of Iraq.

Why I Don't Like the Fourth of July

Unemployment Figures Underscore Need for New Stimulus

Julie Bolz,

My guest this week is Julie Bolz, a women's rights and human rights activist, who has built or repaired dozens of schools in Afghanistan.
MP3 Download |

Shepard Fairey, Citizen Artist

The maker of the iconic “Hope” poster has turned frustration and anger into inspiration.

Changing Obama's Mindset

Obama has to be pulled in the right direction.

Pete Rose Hits it Around

Want to feel old? Pete Rose just turned sixty-eight. Want to feel young? Talk baseball with Pete Rose.

Naomi Klein Interview

“We don’t have a right to be disappointed” by Obama, says the author of The Shock Doctrine.
Sign up for e-mail updates
Links from the Editors
The United States’ Anti-Democratic Pattern in Honduras [link]
Progressivism is Mainstream [link]
The Banks Own Congress [link]
U.S. Evangelicals join the nuclear-weapon-free world movement [link]
Netanyahu Speaks; The Israel-Palestine Ball Remains in Obama's Court [link]
[link] Why Feingold Opposed McChrystal


About

The Progressive Magazine since 1909. Home of Howard Zinn, Barbara Ehrenreich, Ruth Conniff, radio, video, and Matthew Rothschild's McCarthyism Watch.

Since its founding by Sen. Robert La Follette, The Progressive has steadfastly opposed corporate power and reckless U.S. interventionism and has championed peace, women's rights, civil rights, civil liberties, a preserved environment, an independent media, and real democracy.

Copyright 2009, The Progressive Magazine. All Rights Reserved.