Cheney at AIPAC: It’s the U.S. and Israel Against All Comers

Update: Dems Surrender War Powers to AIPAC
By Matthew Rothschild

March 16, 2007

My hopes are down on the Democrats.

And I don’t mean on their chances of winning the White House in 2008.

I mean their chances of acting on principle today, in the here and now, about Iran.

This week, amazingly, the Democrats in the House agreed to strip out of the military spending bill any mention of the need for Bush to come to Congress before he goes and bombs Iran.

According to the AP, they did so because of “its possible impact on Israel.”

Now this is crazy.

U.S. legislators are willing to suspend Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution, which gives Congress the sole authority to declare war, because they don’t want to upset Israel or its supporters here at home?

AIPAC members were busily lobbying Capitol Hill earlier this week, and it looks like they prevailed yet again.

This time, over our Constitution.

That Democratic legislators would have such little reverence for that document is shocking enough.

And that they would have no institutional pride in their own authority is equally appalling.

But that they would surrender that power not because of some emergency but because they are bowing to the wishes of a foreign country is even more unbelievable.

Cheney at AIPAC: It’s the U.S. and Israel Against All Comers
By Matthew Rothschild

March 13, 2007

The Bush Administration seems to believe that a belligerent United States and an intransigent Israel can take on all comers.

So it was that Dick Cheney went to AIPAC’s convention in Washington on Monday to heap praise upon this lobby, which defends every illegal act that the government of Israel commits.

This is the cozy, symbiotic relationship that AIPAC has with the Bush Administration: AIPAC wants Bush to eliminate the Iranian threat to Israel, and Bush wants AIPAC to pressure Congress so he can play out his macho fantasies worldwide.

Said Cheney: “I commend AIPAC for the fine work you do,” adding, “I bring warm regards from the President of the United States. . . . He asked me to convey to this gathering his great appreciation for your efforts.”

One of those recent efforts has been to oppose Congressional attempts to make Bush get legislative approval before he goes out and bombs Iran. This is the cozy, symbiotic relationship that AIPAC has with the Bush Administration: AIPAC wants Bush to eliminate the Iranian threat to Israel, and Bush wants AIPAC to pressure Congress so he can play out his macho fantasies worldwide.

In his talk, Cheney linked Israel and America arm in arm as the bastions of all that is good in the world.

“Progress in the cause of security and long-term peace never comes easily,” he said. “Yet the United States and Israel persevere in that cause.” This requires, he said, “moral clarity, the courage of our convictions, a willingness to act when action is necessary, and a refusal to submit to any form of intimidation, ever. These qualities are a credit to the American and the Israeli people.”

The crowd cheered. Not a surprise. AIPAC has been the chief cheerleader all along for Bush’s adventurism.

And the convention continued to cheer as Cheney talked tough on Iran and Iraq.

“If Iran’s allies [in Iraq] prevailed,” he said, “Tehran’s own designs for the Middle East would be advanced and the threat to our friends in the region would only be magnified. My friends, it is simply not consistent for anyone to demand aggressive action against the menace posed by the Iranian regime while, at the same time, acquiescing in a retreat from Iraq that would leave our worst enemies dramatically emboldened.”

So this is a new reason for continuing the bloody Iraq War.

Now we’ve got to stay in Iraq to prevent Iran from gaining power because then Iran would be a greater threat to Israel.

The irony is that people who opposed the war from the start, from Noam Chomsky to Brent Scowcroft, warned that it would only strengthen Iran.

Cheney must have known this, too. But he probably thought, if that happens we’ll just go on to Tehran.

Which would only make AIPAC all the happier.

Why I Don't Like the Fourth of July

Unemployment Figures Underscore Need for New Stimulus

Julie Bolz,

My guest this week is Julie Bolz, a women's rights and human rights activist, who has built or repaired dozens of schools in Afghanistan.
MP3 Download |

Shepard Fairey, Citizen Artist

The maker of the iconic “Hope” poster has turned frustration and anger into inspiration.

Changing Obama's Mindset

Obama has to be pulled in the right direction.

Pete Rose Hits it Around

Want to feel old? Pete Rose just turned sixty-eight. Want to feel young? Talk baseball with Pete Rose.

Naomi Klein Interview

“We don’t have a right to be disappointed” by Obama, says the author of The Shock Doctrine.
Sign up for e-mail updates
Links from the Editors
The United States’ Anti-Democratic Pattern in Honduras [link]
Progressivism is Mainstream [link]
The Banks Own Congress [link]
U.S. Evangelicals join the nuclear-weapon-free world movement [link]
Netanyahu Speaks; The Israel-Palestine Ball Remains in Obama's Court [link]
[link] Why Feingold Opposed McChrystal


About

The Progressive Magazine since 1909. Home of Howard Zinn, Barbara Ehrenreich, Ruth Conniff, radio, video, and Matthew Rothschild's McCarthyism Watch.

Since its founding by Sen. Robert La Follette, The Progressive has steadfastly opposed corporate power and reckless U.S. interventionism and has championed peace, women's rights, civil rights, civil liberties, a preserved environment, an independent media, and real democracy.

Copyright 2009, The Progressive Magazine. All Rights Reserved.