Where’s the Relief for those Facing Foreclosure?

By Matthew Rothschild, September 19, 2008

With the feds prepared to throw a trillion dollars of our hard-earned money to prop up Wall Street and the investor class, is it too much to ask them to do something for the people who are the real victims of this mess?

I’m talking about the people who’ve already been forced into foreclosure or those who are just about to be.

I mean, if the government is going to back the mortgage securities, why doesn’t it just pick up the mortgages itself, and let people stay in their homes.

Let the government, at least on a temporary basis, become the savings and loan officer, with the power to renegotiate the mortgage downward and adjust the payments and interest rates downward, as well.

The government would have to shell out less money than it’s planning to at this moment, and it would be buying up real property, which will retain most of its value, unlike some of the bad paper the government is scooping up right now.

Assume there are three million people in, or facing, foreclosure. And assume that the media value of each home is $200,000. That’s $600 billion. Even if the houses were overvalued by 30 percent, the government would be on the hook for $420 billion—far less than it’s exposing itself to now.

Or, the government could let people stay in their homes and become renters, as Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research has proposed.

Unfortunately, the Democrats aren’t advocating any of this.

But they are urging Congress to pass a law that would allow judges the power to renegotiate the mortgages of those who file for bankruptcy.

Check this out: Under current law, judges are not allowed to do that on your primary residence, only on those other houses you might own.

But who owns more than one house?

John McCain and his friends, I suppose, and that’s who the laws have been written for.

We need to change not only this class-biased law, but the entire upper-class orientation of the government. And now’s the perfect time to start.

Why I Don't Like the Fourth of July

Unemployment Figures Underscore Need for New Stimulus

Julie Bolz,

My guest this week is Julie Bolz, a women's rights and human rights activist, who has built or repaired dozens of schools in Afghanistan.
MP3 Download |

Shepard Fairey, Citizen Artist

The maker of the iconic “Hope” poster has turned frustration and anger into inspiration.

Changing Obama's Mindset

Obama has to be pulled in the right direction.

Pete Rose Hits it Around

Want to feel old? Pete Rose just turned sixty-eight. Want to feel young? Talk baseball with Pete Rose.

Naomi Klein Interview

“We don’t have a right to be disappointed” by Obama, says the author of The Shock Doctrine.
Sign up for e-mail updates
Links from the Editors
The United States’ Anti-Democratic Pattern in Honduras [link]
Progressivism is Mainstream [link]
The Banks Own Congress [link]
U.S. Evangelicals join the nuclear-weapon-free world movement [link]
Netanyahu Speaks; The Israel-Palestine Ball Remains in Obama's Court [link]
[link] Why Feingold Opposed McChrystal


About

The Progressive Magazine since 1909. Home of Howard Zinn, Barbara Ehrenreich, Ruth Conniff, radio, video, and Matthew Rothschild's McCarthyism Watch.

Since its founding by Sen. Robert La Follette, The Progressive has steadfastly opposed corporate power and reckless U.S. interventionism and has championed peace, women's rights, civil rights, civil liberties, a preserved environment, an independent media, and real democracy.

Copyright 2009, The Progressive Magazine. All Rights Reserved.