Problems with Obama's Speech
I liked parts of Obama’s speech.
Yes, it was a relief to discover that he could throw a punch.
Yes, it was reassuring to see him talk so clearly about the day-to-day problems facing working Americans.
And I especially appreciated his defense of government as a positive force for change, not as an ATM for those who already have money and influence.
“What it should do,” he said, “is that which we cannot do for ourselves—protect us from harm and provide every child a decent education; keep our water clean and our toys safe; invest in new schools and new roads and new science and technology.”
He could have gone further and argued that the government needs to provide a floor of decency for every American so no one is any longer in poverty. But at least it was a start.
However, I could have lived without seeing him do his Bill Cosby imitation yet again, telling us all to be good fathers, with a clear subtext of criticism aimed at his own black community.
I could have lived without his proposal to do away with the capital gains tax for small businesses.
And I really could have lived without his pledge to “safely harness nuclear power,” which isn’t possible, but is a huge bone to throw to some of his biggest contributors, who happen to be from that industry.
Finally, I take great exception to his claim that the Bush-Cheney foreign policy (which he insisted on calling the “Bush-McCain foreign policy”) marked a huge departure from the bipartisan foreign policy of the past decades, and to his insistence that he’d restore that consensus.
The United States was an empire before Bush-Cheney. It illegally invaded foreign countries before Bush-Cheney. And it engaged in torture before Bush-Cheney.
The Bush-Cheney foreign policy may have been an empire on steroids.
But if you take the steroids away, it’s still an empire.
And Obama did not show a shred of recognition of that fact, or of the anti-democratic, anti-human-rights consequences that flow from it.
We all know he doesn’t want to be Bush Jr. But did you know he wants to be Bush Sr.?
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
|
Resist Censorship in Tucson
- Banned in Tucson
- An Interview with Carlos Muñoz on the Tucson Book Ban
| Banned Authors Respond | |
CURRENT ISSUE: FEBRUARY 2012
Inside the Occupy Movement
Arun Gupta and Michelle Fawcett | We visited nearly thirty occupations in twenty states in two months.
What I got at Occupy Wall Street
Breanna Lembitz | I spent seven weeks in Zuccotti Park, and here is what I got.
Danny Glover
Ed Rampell | The Progressive Interview | March 2012 issue
To Wed or Not to Wed
Stephanie Fairyington | March 2012 issue
Progressive Matt
The Koch Brothers Conspire to Buy the White House
Ruth Conniff at the People's Legislature in Madison
Standing for Justice at the Capitol. Matthew Rothschild.
Come to Progressive Talks and Events
Feb. 18, 5:30 p.m.
Ruth Conniff, Progressive Principles Conference at Yale University 11-1
Read more >>
Thursday February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
VandeBurg Room, Pyle Center. Madison, WI
Not Just Gandhi: The Tradition of Nonviolence Among Muslims in South Asia
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>
Friday February 17 at 7:30 p.m. Kate Clinton at the Barrymore with Michael Feldman in Madison.
Thursday February 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Garden Key Room, Student Union, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today
Amitabh Pal Managing Editor, The Progressive magazine.
Read more >>








Comments