Farm Bill Fiasco
Deciding how America will nourish itself and sustain its farms would seem a top policy priority, yet as the Farm Bill demonstrates, sustainably grown healthy food and livable incomes for farmers and workers remain an afterthought in a process controlled almost entirely by agribusiness and a handful of farm-state legislators.
Despite strong public opinion supporting local food, farmer’s markets, organic agriculture, food workers’ rights and access to fresh produce, agribusiness and commodity interests continue to dominate food and farming policy.
That’s largely due to their prodigious lobbying clout: Agribusiness spent $137 million last year muscling Congress to do its bidding and another $46.6 million on federal candidates (about 60 percent Republican) in 2010. This phalanx of power includes commodity producer groups like the American Corn Growers Association; corporate food processors and purveyors such as Kraft and Dean Foods; the Farm Bureau; dairy and meat industry giants; and seed and petrochemical corporations like Monsanto.
On the other side, armed with ideas and passion but little money, stand hundreds of groups from across the U.S. pressing Congress on an array of policies—including commodity subsidy reform, fair prices for farmers, public monies for local foods and small farmers, and conservation and nutrition funding. With a handful of lobbyists and diverse interests, they fight doggedly for small wedges of the Farm Bill pie.
But is the Farm Bill a productive venue for food movements to make meaningful change in food and farming policy?
Reforms Thrown Off the Cliff
In the 2012-2013 version, after months of work by dozens of advocacy groups, a promising Farm Bill sponsored by Michigan Senator and agriculture committee chair Debbie Stabenow —protecting nutrition and conservation while reforming subsidy inequities and supporting local food—was hijacked in a New Year’s Eve “fiscal cliff” budget deal struck by Senator Mitch McConnell and Vice President Joe Biden.
According to the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, the McConnell-Biden deal “disposed of programs for new farmers, minority farmers, healthy food markets, rural job programs, renewable energy, specialty crop and organic research and organic farming, and protected every last red cent of direct commodity subsidies.” The deal was “a complete blow to local food and farming,” slicing out $80 million in funding for those priorities, adds Kari Hamerschlag of the Environmental Working Group.
The fiscal cliff and Farm Bill extensions—now being challenged by new measures in Congress—maintained a disastrous status quo:
• Deeply inequitable subsidies and crop insurance payments skewed to the wealthiest farms, primarily for monocrop production of commodities (e.g. corn and soy) for food additives, livestock feed and fuel
• No livable wage guarantees for farmers and workers who still toil within a corporate-controlled “cheap food” economy that systematically exploits them
• Chemical-intensive farming identified by the EPA as a top polluter of over half of the country’s rivers and streams
• Meager public investment in fruits, vegetables and organic farming despite evidence showing they are far healthier for us and for the planet than subsidized commodity crops
• Ignoring the blatant connections between commodity subsidies, junk food and obesity, the Farm Bill continues to incentivize mass production of commodities like corn and soy as “inputs” to sodas, fast food and industrially produced meat.
While imposing austerity to avoid the fiscal cliff—and pandering to the agribusiness lobby—the bill sends our food system careening towards a very different cliff: social, economic, and environmental catastrophe. Daniel Imhoff, author of “Food Fight!,” notes that encouraging the expansion of commodity production is likely to have devastating environmental consequences.
The subsidy system really exists to ensure that lenders and insurers get paid for keeping the commodity crapshoot afloat. It’s especially important as more and more crops fry in the summer sun or are flooded out by mega-storms. Crop insurance—with no ties to conservation requirements, along with no increase in Conservation Reserve Program rental rates—has led to a massive plow-up across the Midwest. We are well set up for another Dust Bowl.
Farm Bill policies threaten to decimate the fertility of large swaths of farmland. Those who will suffer most are farming families and poor consumers—in the US and around the world—subjected to extreme food price volatility while agrifood monopolies continue to reap enormous profits.
The global reach of the Farm Bill is vast. As the world’s largest exporter of agricultural commodities, “U.S. agriculture policy is, effectively, trade policy” notes Gawain Kripke, director of policy and research at Oxfam America.
The Farm Bill encourages farmers to overproduce. The surplus is then “dumped” on foreign markets—either as food aid or commercial exports—at below the cost of production, a practice that destroys farmer livelihoods and food systems in the Global South, making them dependent on US imports.
This structural dependence makes poor countries vulnerable to environmental shocks and speculative bubbles that send food prices soaring—leading to social upheavals like the 2008 food rebellions and the 2011 “Arab Spring” uprisings.
In 2012, a severe Midwest drought that affected 80 percent of the U.S. corn crop triggered a spike in global prices, with ripples throughout the food system. Combined with a renewable fuel mandate that diverts nearly 40 percent of US corn to ethanol production, food-importing countries were hit especially hard.
In the same year, investment firm Goldman Sachs made an estimated $400 million betting on global food prices. The increasing influence of financial companies, pension funds and sovereign wealth funds in the food system is part of a growing “financialization” of food, water, and land.
In “Bet the Farm,” Frederick Kaufman explains how food has “become an investment, equivalent to oil, gold, silver, or any other commodity, equity, or derivative. The higher the price, the better the investment. The better the investment, the more costly the food. And those who cannot pay the price pay with hunger.”
With such high stakes, the Farm Bill is difficult to ignore, even as it is controlled by corporate interests and seemingly impermeable to reform.
If there is any hope, it lies in the growing U.S. food movement. But to steer a truly sustainable and equitable course, it must build a powerful, unified voice and demand a radical change in direction.
This article is a co-publication with Food First. Visit here for the full version: http://www.foodfirst.org/en/node/4260. Christopher Cook is a contributing writer for The Progressive and author of Diet for a Dead Planet: Big Business and the Coming Food Crisis. See more of his work at www.christopherdcook.com.
- Give a Gift
- About Us
- Civil Liberties
CURRENT ISSUE: December 2013 / January 2014
Rick Bass | Why I’m left with no choice but to put my body on the line.
When Government Was Neighborly
Wendell Berry | Saluting a New Deal program that helped Kentucky farmers.
The Bravest Woman I Know
Kathy Kelly | How an eighty-two-year-old librarian braved Baghdad.
How to Build a New World
Naomi Klein | Why I was wrong in The Shock Doctrine—and what we must do now.