On the Poppy Trail

By Reese Erlich in the November issue

The road from Kabul to Jalalabad is perfectly safe today,” my colleague Najibullah told me. “It hasn’t been bombed for four days.” Driving in a beat-up old Toyota, Najib, the driver, and I were all wearing traditional Afghan baggy pants and long shirts. We hoped to slip through government checkpoints as well as confuse any lurking insurgents. It worked.

We drove through a deep valley surrounded on both sides by high, rugged mountains. The pass reminded me why conquering Afghanistan has never been easy. A few people atop the cliffs armed with nothing more than rocks to start an avalanche could hold off a conquering ground army for weeks.

Conquering the opium/heroin trade in Afghanistan has proven to be just as difficult. For eight years, Republican and Democratic administrations have said the Taliban controls narcotic trafficking in Afghanistan. In fact, according to both the CIA and the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, the insurgents control about 2-3 percent of the total. I was traveling through Afghanistan in mufti to find out who really rules the world’s largest supply of heroin.

In Jalalabad, a series of dirt roads led us to farmer Ebdullah Ebad. The craggy-faced farmer had wrapped a traditional scarf on his head to protect against the burning sun. Ebad and his family once grew opium poppy here. Today, they have planted vegetables and an apricot orchard as part of a U.S.-sponsored crop substitution program.

In the 1990s, Ebad tells me, poppy was a profitable cash crop. From 2000 to 2001, under international pressure, the Taliban stopped poppy growing. But the trade sprang back within weeks after the U.S. invasion in October 2001.

It was simple free market economics. The West had a demand for heroin. Afghanistan had hardworking farmers and entrepreneurial drug traffickers who could match supply with demand. Once the U.S. invaded, there were no more of those pesky government regulations to bother the narco-capitalists.

The U.S.-allied Northern Alliance, the mujahedeen who had continued to fight the Taliban in the 1990s, supported themselves through heroin production and distribution. After the U.S. invasion, they simply moved their headquarters to Kabul as part of the newly installed Hamid Karzai government. Poppy was back in bloom, and Afghanistan quickly became the world’s number one heroin supplier.

Those were boom times for the Ebad family. Starting in 2004, they grew poppy. Raw opium was fetching $220/kilo. “It made economic sense,” Ebad says. “With that money, we solved all of our problems.”

Local drug traffickers loaned him money to plant the crop. The traffickers shipped the opium to primitive labs where it was turned into heroin for eventual shipment to nearby Pakistan. Each step of the process was protected by local police and political officials. They, in turn, were protected by networks of traffickers reaching all the way to the Karzai cabinet. The mainstream media largely ignored the role of government officials, however, instead spreading the myth that the Taliban controlled most of the drug trade.

That coverage began to shift in the past year as Karzai has become more unpopular in Washington. U.S. officials leaked stories linking Karzai officials to the drug trade. The New York Times reported, for example, that former Defense Minister Marshal Muhammad Qasim Fahim, who is Karzai’s vice presidential candidate, shipped his heroin to Russia in a government cargo plane, which then returned stuffed with cash. The Times also wrote that Ahmed Wali Karzai, half-brother of the president, has taken control of the heroin trade in Kandahar.

Mohammad Zafar, Afghanistan’s deputy anti-narcotics minister, told me those charges are untrue. “If any person is involved, even the brother of the president, he will be captured by the government,” he informs me in an interview in Kabul. “We don’t have any evidence in this regard.”

But the U.N. drug office has a decidedly different viewpoint. I visited the agency’s heavily fortified compound in Kabul. Workers were putting the finishing touches on a new blast wall inside the existing eight-foot-high blast wall. One can’t be too careful in Kabul these days.

Jean-Luc Lemahieu, head of the Afghanistan office, came out to greet me with a wide smile and firm handshake. We spent some time at his computer crunching numbers. According to his figures, the insurgents directly control only about $125 million of the country’s $4.4 billion heroin trade. The CIA puts the Taliban control at $75 million.

So, Lemahieu noted, about 97 percent of the drug trade in Afghanistan is controlled by traffickers other than the insurgents.

“There are people in this government who are the big architects,” he tells me. “That’s what’s dangerous.”

The Taliban do tax poppy farmers and extort protection money from smugglers passing through their territory. But they don’t control the national smuggling rings. Criminal gangs and pro-U.S. warlords control that part of the business and happily collude with the insurgents on buying, selling, and shipping heroin.

“The parliament issues statements that the international community wants to hear,” says Lemahieu. “And then at night they are negotiating trade agreements with people who are considered their enemy.”

The pro-U.S. warlords use drug money to finance their militias, grease their patronage machines, and bribe government officials, according to Afzal Rashid, a former senior adviser to the Afghan Ministry of Finance who now lives in California.

“The whole Ministry of Interior was corrupt in its relations with the drug dealers,” he says.

Rashid says the United States and Karzai ignore the high-level drug traffickers because their support is needed for the U.S. war effort.

“I’m sure the U.S. Army looked the other way,” says Rashid. “Maybe the warlords were helping identify Al Qaeda.”

The United States and other occupying powers say they no longer emphasize poppy eradication, which unfairly targets small farmers, but instead focus on arresting drug traffickers.

Afghanistan, which continues to supply 90 percent of the world’s opium, has had some limited success with a combination of legal crackdowns and crop substitution. According to the U.N. survey issued in September, opium production has dropped by 22 percent over the past year.

Lemahieu said the number one reason for the decrease is the low price of opium. Raw opium fetches about $50/kilo, making the cultivation of wheat, vegetables, and fruit relatively more profitable. He notes that if the price of opium rises, then heroin production will increase. That’s the capitalist market.

For farmer Ebad, abandoning poppy cultivation was a straight-up economic decision. Squatting in his field where the poppies used to grow, he told me when the price of raw opium dropped, he welcomed U.S. efforts to help his family grow other crops.

Ebad wanted the USAID program to continue because he got free seedlings, fertilizer, and advice on growing new crops. But that program has already ended. Without subsidies, he feared he wouldn’t be able to make enough profit. And, he said with a chuckle, if his new crops aren’t profitable enough, “I’ll return to planting poppy.”

If that happens, there will be plenty of U.S. allies ready to buy, process, and ship his crop to eager international markets.

Freelance journalist Reese Erlich has covered Afghanistan and the Middle East for twenty-three years. He won a Peabody Award (shared with others) and was honored by Project Censored for his Middle East coverage. His fourth book, “Conversations with Terrorists,” will be published in 2010.

Share: Facebook   Reddit   del.icio.us   ma.gnolia.com   stumbleupon   Technorati   Google   YahooMyWeb   Email   Disqus  

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

About The Progressive

On January 9, 1909, Senator Robert M. La Follette Sr. of Wisconsin founded La Follette's Weekly to be "a magazine of progress, social, intellectual, institutional." The goal, he wrote, was "winning back for the people the complete power over government — national, state, and municipal — which has been lost to them." He attacked private greed in the form of corporate monopolies that hoarded power. He championed the public interest, campaigning for social and economic justice. And he urged the United States not to entangle itself in foreign wars.

In 1929, La Follette's Weekly changed its name to The Progressive, but the views of the magazine have remained remarkably consistent over the years. The Progressive, a monthly since 1948, has steadfastly stood against militarism, the concentration of power in corporate hands, and the disenfranchisement of the citizenry. It has continued to champion peace, social and economic justice, civil rights, civil liberties, human rights, a preserved environment, and a reinvigorated democracy. Its bedrock values remain nonviolence and freedom of speech.

In 2009, The Progressive celebrated its centennial by publishing its anthology, Democracy in Print: The Best of The Progressive Magazine, 1909-2009 (Univ. of Wisconsin Press). And the April 2009 issue of The Progressive was a special commemorative one. Devoting a single page to each year of The Progressive, this issue served up kernels of wisdom from the archives. It's a walk through 100 years of U.S. history and progressive history. And it includes quotations from Jane Addams, James Baldwin, Louis Brandeis, Theodore Dreiser, Sen. Russ Feingold, Molly Ivins, June Jordan, Helen Keller, Martin Luther King, Jr., Sinclair Lewis, Milton Mayer, Arundhati Roy, Bertrand Russell, Edward Said, Cindy Sheehan, Upton Sinclair, Terry Tempest Williams, Gore Vidal, Paul Wellstone, and Howard Zinn.

Today, The Progressive publishes great writers and social critics such as: Wendell Berry, Edwidge Danticat, Barbara Ehrenreich, Eduardo Galeano, Jim Hightower, Luis Rodriguez, Dave Zirin, and Howard Zinn. It also provides comic relief with columns by humorists Kate Clinton and Will Durst. Some of America's leading poets—Adrienne Rich, Martín Espada, C.K. Williams, and Rita Dove—publish original work in The Progressive. The magazine also publishes a monthly interview with an activist, artist, writer, scholar, or political figure. Here are some of the people we've interviewed in the last decade: Howard Dean, Ani DiFranco, Steve Earle, Janeane Garofalo, Danny Glover, Amy Goodman, Mikhail Gorbachev, Seymour Hersh, Naomi Klein, Bill McKibben, Barack Obama, Michael Pollan, Robert Redford, Martin Sheen, Joseph Stiglitz, Helen Thomas, Alice Walker, and Elizabeth Warren.

The Progressive, in every issue, highlights the work of grassroots activists.

Meet the Editors

Matthew Rothschild, Editor

Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine, which is one of the leading voices for peace and social justice in this country. Rothschild has appeared on Nightline, C-SPAN, The O'Reilly Factor, and NPR, and his newspaper commentaries have run in the Chicago Tribune, the L.A. Times, the Miami Herald, and a host of other newspapers. Rothschild is also the author of a book entitled You Have No Rights: Stories of America in Our Repressive Age (New Press, 2007). A graduate of Harvard University, Rothschild prior to coming to The Progressive worked as the editor of Multinational Monitor, a magazine founded by Ralph Nader. Rothschild came to The Progressive in 1983, and has worked for the magazine in many different capacities, first as associate editor, then managing editor, then publisher, and since 1994 as editor. Rothschild brought on distinguished social critics as columnists, including Barbara Ehrenreich, Eduardo Galeano, and Howard Zinn. He added monthly original poetry from the likes of Martín Espada and Adrienne Rich, and he added the humorists Kate Clinton and Will Durst. On the magazine's website, Rothschild contributes several times a week with his "This Just In" commentaries. And he keeps a running tally of civil liberties infringements in his "McCarthyism Watch." Rothschild writes monthly in The Progressive. He has interviewed Senator Russ Feingold, singer Ani DiFranco, Robert Redford, and the journalist Robert Fisk. He also hosts Progressive Radio, a syndicated weekly half-hour program, and he does radio commentaries Monday through Friday. Rothschild is also the co-founder and director of The Progressive Media Project, which since 1993 has been distributing opinion pieces to newspapers around the country in an effort to diversify and democratize the national debate. In 2007, Rothschild published his first book, You Have No Rights: Stories of America in an Age of Repression (The New Press). In 2009, he edited Democracy in Print: The Best of The Progressive, 1909-2009 (Univ. of Wisconsin Press).

Amitabh Pal, Managing Editor

Amitabh Pal came to the Progressive Media Project, an affiliate of The Progressive magazine, in 1997 as the associate editor. A few years later, he became the managing editor of The Progressive magazine. And for the last several years, he has served both in that capacity and as the co-editor of the Progressive Media Project. For The Progressive, Pal has written several articles on nonviolence, including a profile of Badshah Khan, the Frontier Gandhi. For The Progressive, he has interviewed Jimmy Carter, Mikhail Gorbachev, the Dalai Lama, and Joseph Stiglitz. He also is finishing up his first book about nonviolent activism in Muslim societies, forthcoming from Praeger.

Ruth Conniff, Political Editor

Ruth Conniff covers national politics for The Progressive and is a voice of The Progressive on many TV and radio programs. Conniff was a regular on CNN's Sunday Capital Gang and is now a regular on PBS's To the Contrary. She also has appeared frequently on C-SPAN's Washington Journal and on NPR and Pacifica. Conniff's op-ed commentaries have appeared in The Washington Post, The New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times. She also contributes regularly to Isthmus, Madison's weekly newspaper. Conniff became The Progressive's Associate Editor in 1991, and Managing Editor in January 1997. In recent years, she has interviewed William Greider, Rep. Marcy Kaptur, and Elizabeth Warren.

Elizabeth DiNovella, Culture Editor

Elizabeth DiNovella is Culture Editor of The Progressive magazine. She writes about activism, politics, music, books, and film. She also produces Progressive Radio, a thirty-minute public affairs program hosted by Matthew Rothschild.

In recent years, she has interviewed Amy Goodman, Linton Kwesi Johnson, and Elena Poniatoska for The Progressive.

DiNovella joined The Progressive staff in 2001. She became Associate Editor in 2002 and Culture Editor in 2003.

Before working for The Progressive, DiNovella was the News and Public Affairs Director at WORT-FM, the community radio station of Madison, Wisconsin. She now volunteers in the news department at WORT-FM.

Subscribe!

To subscribe to The Progressive, click here.